SURESHWAR THAKUR, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Dharminder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
1. In pursuance to an advertisement notice, borne in Annexure P-3, the writ petitioner submitted his documents, for the apposite advertised post. The afore advertisement, appertains to recruitment(s) there through, being made to the post of Junior T/Mate/Junior Helper (Sub-Station)/Junior Helper (Power House) (E). The imperative thereto educational qualifications, hence to be possessed by the aspirants concerned, become, borne in Annexure P-3. Moreover, in Annexure P-3, a, note exists qua, none of the aspirants, being amenable to face a personal interview, effect whereof shall become dwelt upon subsequently.
2. A perusal of Page Number 11, of, the Paper Book of Annexure P-3, discloses that, 60 marks were allocable to the aspirants concerned, for theirs, possessing matriculation certificate, and 25 marks were allocable to the aspirants concerned, hence possessing the technical qualification of ITI Electrician/Wireman, from the institution(s), recognized from the Government of Himachal Pradesh. In pursuance thereof, the respondents concerned, proceeded to award the afore marks to the writ petitioner. However, there onwards, after the writ petitioner becom
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.