SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 33

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Somnath Sawaran Lal – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Pal Sood – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr.Ravi Tanta, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr.B.Nandan Vashishta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.

1. Present petition has been preferred against order dated 19.11.2019 passed by learned Rent Controller, Shimla in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 147-6 of 2019 in Rent Petition No. 74-2 of 2017, titled as Dr. Shashi Pal Sood Vs. M/s Som Nath Sawaran Lal and others, whereby application filed on behalf of petitioner under Order 9 Rule 7 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside ex parte order has been dismissed.

2. Petitioner herein is tenant and respondent is landlord and for convenience, hereinafter they shall be referred as such in this order.

3. Landlord has filed a petition on 4.3.2017 under Urban Rent Control Act for eviction of tenant. After service of tenant, reply was filed on 23.9.2017 and issues were framed on 14.12.2017, whereafter case was listed for 9.3.2018 for recording evidence of landlord. On that date, three witnesses, present in the Court, were examined on behalf of landlord and they were cross-examined on behalf of tenant by Mr.Ravi Tanta, Advocate, who appeared as vice Mr.Ajay Kochar, Advocate, engaged by tenant. Evidence on behalf of landlord was closed on that very date and case was listed for rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top