JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The writ petitioner claims, the, making, of, a mandamus upon the respondents, for quashing the selection, and, consequent therewith appointment, of, co-respondent No.3, as, Computer Operator, Development Block, Nankhari, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

2. The gravamen of the afore striving, becomes embedded, in the selection committee, proceeding to, on, the parameter of experience, hence award 15 marks to co- respondent No.3. The apposite abstract of the score-sheet making the afore reflections is appended with the instant writ petition, as, Annexure P-11. The validity of awarding of marks qua therewith, by the selection committee, is contended to be fallacious, as co-respondent No.3 did not, in tandem with the maximum, of, 15 marks allocable, to her, under the parameter of experience, render or perform duties hence relevant to the advertised posts, in any Panchayati Raj institution/ Government Office/undertaking/institution/agency.

3. The afore made contention, does acquire merit, as, the performance(s) by the aspirants concerned, of duties in, the, capacity of computer operator, prior to the apposite selection and consequent therewith appointmen