TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Man Mohan Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
1. Petitioner claims that even though he has availed the benefit of age relaxation and fee concession available to the candidates belonging to Scheduled Tribes category, yet having scored more marks than the last candidate in the General category, he is required to be moved to the General category. Challenge has also been laid to the circular/instruction dated 12.12.2011 issued by the State Government, which provide for migration of only such SC/ST/OBC candidates to the general category merit list who are selected on the same standard as applied to general category candidates.
2. Bare minimum factual position is that :-
2(ii) Age limit prescribed for recruitment to the post of Constable was 18-23 years for general category, whereas for candidates belonging to reserved category of SC/ST/OBC, it was 18 to 25 years. Petitioner had admittedly crossed age limit of 23 years when he applied under the advertisement. Petitioner belonged to Scheduled
Jitendra Kumar Singh and another versus State of Uttar Pradesh in (2010) 3 SCC 119
Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana versus Gurarat Public Service Commission and others (2019) 7 SCC 383
Deepa E.V. versus Union of India and others in (2017) 12 SCC 680
Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana versus Gujarat Public Service Commission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.