SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 97

SANDEEP SHARMA
Shyama Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sat Pal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Abhinandan Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP SHARMA, J.

Cr.MP(M) No.433 of 2020

1. For the reasons set out in the application, delay of 103 days in filing the revision petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Petition be registered

Cr. Revision No._62 of 2021

2. By way of instant criminal revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, challenge has been laid to order dated 6.7.2019 passed by learned Sessions Judge (Family Court), Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., in petition No.111/19/2018, titled as Shyama Devi versus Sat Pal Singh, whereby learned Court below while allowing the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner under Section 127 Cr.P.C., for enhancement of maintenance amount awarded under Section 125 Cr.P.C., enhanced the amount of maintenance from Rs. 2500/- to Rs.6000/-.

3. Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent.

4. Vide order dated 16.6.2010 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mandi, a sum of Rs. 2500/- came to be awarded in favour of the petitioner on account of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Since aforesaid order of maintenance und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top