VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Rajneesh Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.
1. This petition has been preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 30 of 2020, dated 27.10.2020, registered under Sections 376, 323, 451 and 506 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter in short ‘IPC’) at Women Police Station Dharamshala, District Kangra HP and quashing of proceedings initiated in pursuant thereto pending in the concerned Court.
2. Petitioner No.1 Rajneesh Kumari is complainant, who is present in Court today and vide separate statement on oath, she has stated that she is now wife of Shri Pankaj Sharma, petitioner No.2, and earlier he was married to Jeena Rani but their relations with each other were not cordial which resulted in filing of petition for divorce and registration of FIR and during separation from his first wife, petitioner No.2 Pankaj had come in her contract and they have decided to marry each other and started living together. It is further stated by her that there was delay in finalization of divorce petition filed by petitioner for dissolution of his earlier marriage with Jeena Rani and during that period, misunderstanding had cropped up between them, which resulted into lodging of FIR No. 30 of 2020 in Oc
Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab
Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others reported in (2014)6 SCC 466
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others (2019)5 SCC 688
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbathbhai Bhimsinghbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.