SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 115

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.
Nasrin - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. - Respondent
Cr.M.P.(M) No.567 of 2021
Decided On : 09-04-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr.Raju Ram Rahi, Deputy Advocate General. ASI Nasib Singh, I.O. Police Station Sadar.

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 437, 439, 164, 437 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 363, 366A, 370(4), 506 and 120B – Regular Bail – By way of this petition, petitioner is seeking regular bail under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure in case FIR, registered in Police Station under Sections 363, 366A, 370(4), 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code – Status report stands filed, wherein it is stated that victim, aged about 15 years, who is studying in Class 9th, had left her home at 9.30 a.m. to attend her school i.e. Sanatan Dharam Senior Secondary School, Ganj Bazaar, and when she did not return home in the evening, her father, on inquiry, had received information that on that day students were not called in the school – With aforesaid details, father of the victim had approached Police Station Sadar, Shimla, with suspicion that someone had abducted her daughter after alluring and misleading her – Held, No doubt, Section 437 Cr.P.C. deals with situation when accused is produced before the Magistrate and Section 439 Cr.P.C. devolves special power on the High Court and/or Court of Sessions regarding the bail and both Sections deal with different situations in different Courts, but it is also settled position that provisions contained in Sections 437 and 438 Cr.P.C. can also be taken into consideration at time of considering bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. – In fact, Section 437 Cr.P.C. refrains the Court, other than High Court or Court of Sessions, from releasing a person, accused or suspect of commission of any non-bailable offence, who is arrested or detained for without warrant, or appears, or is produced before such Court and there appears reasonable ground for believing that he is guilty of an offence punishable with death, or imprisonment for life. – However, an exception has been carved out enabling such Court to release such a person on bail, in case, such person is under the age of sixteen years, or is a woman, or is sick, or infirm, with further provision that no such person shall be released without giving an opportunity of hearing to the Public Prosecutor, which means that the persons under the age of sixteen years, or woman, or sick, or infirm are also not to be released in all cases, but after considering facts and circumstances brought in the notice of the Court by Public Prosecutor. – Therefore, a woman accused cannot claim her entitlement for bail only for her womanhood, but discretion has been given to Court to decide bail application of a woman after considering facts and circumstances of the case, particularly nature and gravity of offence and role of woman in commission thereof – Case of petitioner can be considered differently than the other accused involved in the case and some of them have been arrested and rest are absconding – Court is of opinion that at this stage, petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail. – Petition Allowed

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.

1. By way of this petition, petitioner is seeking regular bail under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘Cr.P.C.’), in case FIR No.34 of 2021, dated 05.03.2021, registered in Police Station Sadar, Shimla, H.P., under Sections 363, 366A, 370(4), 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’).

2. Status report stands filed, wherein it is stated that on 05.03.2021 victim, aged about 15 years, who is studying in Class 9th, had left her home at 9.30 a.m. to attend her school i.e. Sanatan Dharam Senior Secondary School, Ganj Bazaar, Shimla, and when she did not return home in the evening, her father, on inquiry, had received information that on that day students were not called in the school. With aforesaid details, father of the victim had approached Police Station Sadar, Shimla, with suspicion that someone had abducted her daughter after alluring and misleading her.

3. As per status report, on complaint of father of the victim, case under Section 363 IPC was registered and investigation was started. During investigation, location of mobile number of victim was found in Haryana leading to the clue to the police that victim was travelling towards Delhi. Whereupon, police party was sent to Delhi in search of victim and it was also found that victim was having too many talks on two mobile numbers (96398-21301 and 62382-27896), therefore, CDRs and location of those two numbers were also requisitioned.

4. Investigating Officer, on 06.03.2021, after reaching in Police Station Badarpur, Delhi, started investigation and found that last location of victim, on 05.03.2021 at about 8.19 p.m., was found at Panipat and thereafter her phone was found switched off. From CDRs of two mobile numbers, Investigating Officer had contacted on some mobile numbers, which were found in contact of these two mobile numbers and during this exercise, one mobile number 95606-42747 was found to be of one Jatin Malik, who, in response, informed the Investigating Officer that he is having a Maruti Car bearing registration No.DL9CAP-3819 and on 05.03.2021 he had gone to Ambala from Delhi to drop a passenger and at Ambala a girl had met him, who had disclosed that she was going to Delhi, whereupon, when he was taking that girl to Delhi alongwith him and had reached near Panipat, mobile phone of that girl had switched off and for that reason that girl had contacted someone through his (Jatin’s) mobile and the person, with whom she had talked, had disclosed his name to him (Jatin) as Zuber and further that Zuber had told him that one boy will send him location from mobile number 96671-56859 and had asked him (Jatin) to drop the victim on that location and thereafter on receiving location of Badarpur, Delhi from the aforesaid number, he had dropped victim at Badarpur NTPC Chowk at about 10.30 p.m. on 05.03.2021, wherefrom a boy had taken her.

5. During investigation, it was revealed that the boy, who had sent the location, was one Ibrahim residing at Badarpur in a room rented in a building known as ‘Akash’. During search for Ibrahim, his room was found locked and it came in notice that he was hiding in some other house in the room of his friend, wherefrom he was apprehended and taken to Badarpur Police Station and shown to Jatin, and Jatin had identified him the same boy to whom he had handed over the girl on 05.03.2021.

6. During interrogation, Ibrahim had disclosed that on 05.03.2021 he had received calls from Zuber and Nazim @ Sameer, the boys belonging to his village, who were working with him earlier at Delhi, but presently Zuber was at Chennai, whereas, Nazim @ Sameer was in Kerala. He had further revealed that both of them had informed him that one ‘X’ named girl (victim) would come in some vehicle at Badarpur NTPC Gate and they had asked him to take her to his quarter and further that on request of these two persons he had taken victim from Badarpur NTPC Gate to his room in ‘Akash’ building and had kept her in his

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top