SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 105

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Mangal Singh Negi – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Anshul Bansal, Mr. Anshul Attri and Ms Manju Dhatwalia, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.

1. Instant petition has been preferred seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘Cr.P.C.’) in favour of petitioner in case FIR Crime No.RC0962019A0002 of 2019 registered in SPE Branch CBI, ACB, Shimla, H.P., under Sections 120-B alongwith Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) and Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(c) & (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act.

2. Petitioner had joined Allahabad Bank as a Probationer Officer. Thereafter he was promoted as a Manager and as of now he is serving as a Senior Manager in Allahabad Bank (now known as Indian Bank) Hamirpur. In present case, opening of accounts of ASA Marketing Solutions and large number of students, during posting of the petitioner in Branches of Allahabad Bank at Panchkula, Solan and Chandigarh is the fact for considering him as an accused in scholarship scam.

3. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest, during ongoing investigation by CBI being carried out with respect to as many as 26 Institutions, regarding scholarsh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top