SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(HP) 799

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Karamvir – Appellant
Versus
Narcotic Control Bureau Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, Ashwani Pathak, Advocate, Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vivek Singh Thakur, J. - Petitioner has preferred this petition, under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail in case Crime No. 66 of 2019, dated 7.11.2019 registered under Sections 8, 20, 25, 28, 29 and 60 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (hereinafter referred to as 'NDPS Act') in Police Station Narcotics Control Bureau,Chandigarh, District Chandigarh.

2. Prosecution case, as evident from copy of complaint filed with petition, is that on 7.11.2019, a specific information was received by Rajan Singh Bisht, Surveillance Assistant NCB through reliable source with respect to trafficking of charas and opium, which was reduced into writing by him and put up before Superintendent NCB Chandigarh at 01.05 PM, whereupon Superintendent NCB had instructed to constitute a team to take further necessary action as per law.

3. As per information, two persons, namely Kuldeep and Hardeep, both resident of Mani Majra Chandigarh, were engaged in charas and opium trafficking and they had been transporting a huge consignment of charas and opium on that day, received from one Dev Raj, resident of Banjar to deliver it to one Karamvir @ Landa resident of Pinjore (petitioner) by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top