CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Roshan Deen – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintained by the petitioner against the respondents praying therein for the following substantive reliefs :
(ii) That if it is found that there is anything in the Joint Note dated 27.4.2010, Annexure P6 and clarification dated 9.11.2012, Annexure P11 excluding the category of prematurely retired officer on total incapacity for the purpose of exercising option for Pension Scheme, in that event such exclusion may also be quashed and set aside being in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, with all consequential benefits;
(iii) That the respondent Bank may be directed to accept the option of the petitioner, Annexure P8 submitted pursuant to Joint Note dated 27.4.2010, Annexure P6 circulated vide circular dated 9.9.2010, Annexure P7 and another option submitted by him vide Annexure P13, pursuant to clarification dated 9.11.2012, Annexure P11 and consequently he
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.