TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Gitam Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Notice. Mr. J. S. Guleria, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant petition is taken up for final hearing.
3. This petition has been filed by the petitioners for the grant of following substantive relief:
4. It is vehemently argued by Mr. Rajeshwar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioners that once the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short NI Act) are initiated and are already pending against the petitioners, therefore, in no event, could the respondents have registered a case for the same offence i.e. dishonour of cheque, against the petitioners under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of IPC.
5. On the other hand, Mr. Ashok Sharma, learned Advocate G
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.