TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Beasa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Dayal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
The applicant has filed this application under Section 25 (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short the ‘Act’) for the enhancement of the permanent alimony and seeking further directions/clarifications in terms of the liberty reserved vide judgment dated 19.11.2001.
2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present application are that the parties to this application got separated from each other and their marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce granted by this Court vide judgment dated 08.08.1980 passed in FAO No. 4 of 1977 which was upheld in LPA No. 5 of 1980. However, the application under Section 25 of the Act instituted by the applicant/appellant for permanent alimony in LPA No. 5 of 1980 was allowed by this Court vide judgment dated 29.08.1980 on the following terms:-
(ii) The respondent shall deposit Rs.36,000/- in the Court of the District Judge, Mandi on or before 22.08.1982 and on such deposit being m
Kubja Devi vs. Ishwar Dass AIR 2017 HP 21
Seshi Ammal and another Vs. Thaiyu Ammal
Lal Rajindra Narain Singh alias Lallu Sahib Vs. Mt. Sundar Bibi reported in AIR 1925 PC 176
Ram Shanker Rastogi vs. Smt. Vinay Rastogi
Vinny Parmvir Parmar vs. parmvir Parmar
Vishwanath Sitaram Agrawal vs. Sau. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal
Ruby @ Pritipadma Pradhan vs. Debasish Pradhan 2014 (2) OLR 691
Kalyan Dey Chowdhury vs. Rita Dey Chowdhury Nee Nandy (2017) 14 SCC 200
Dr. Kulbhushan Kumar vs. Raj Kumari and Anr. 1970 (3) SCC 129
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.