IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Leela Devi. - Petitioner
Versus
H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd. & Others. – Respondents
CWP No. 1149 of 2021
Decided On : 04-05-2021
Electricity Connection - Entitlement of Occupier - Electricity Act, 2003, HPERC Regulations - Section 43 of Electricity Act, 2003, Regulation 3 of HPERC Regulations, Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - The court discussed the entitlement of an occupier for electricity connection under the Electricity Act, 2003 and HPERC Regulations. It highlighted the duty of the distribution licensee to supply electricity to the premises of the owner or occupier, and the powers conferred upon the licensee to carry out necessary works for providing electricity connection. The court emphasized that the lack of ownership of the land does not preclude an occupier from applying for an electricity connection, and that the distribution licensee is obligated to provide the connection upon completion of necessary formalities. The court also addressed the issue of alternative remedy and the violation of fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, concluding that the petitioner was entitled to the electricity connection.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought an electricity connection to the premises she occupied, despite not being the recorded owner of the land. The respondents opposed the petition, claiming that the petitioner was not entitled to the connection due to lack of ownership of the land and alternative remedies available.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the lack of ownership of the land did not preclude the petitioner from applying for an electricity connection as an occupier. It also concluded that the petitioner was entitled to the electricity connection, and there was no statutory or other bar to the High Court to entertain the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Issues: The issues involved the entitlement of an occupier for an electricity connection, the duty of the distribution licensee to supply electricity, and the availability of alternative remedies.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that an occupier is entitled to apply for an electricity connection under the Electricity Act, 2003 and HPERC Regulations, and the distribution licensee is obligated to provide the connection upon completion of necessary formalities. It also concluded that in cases involving the violation of fundamental rights, the High Court can entertain Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to ensure the release and providing of electricity connection to the petitioner. The court also specified that the petitioner shall continue to pay the requisite charges for electricity supply, and in the event of any default, the authority shall be at liberty to disconnect the supply.
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Petitioner has approached this Court for denial of electricity connection by respondents to her, despite deposit of amount of charges and security, amounting to Rs.10,008/- vide receipt No. 10201033127, dated 6.7.2019, demanded by respondents after completion of necessary codal formalities, to the premises occupied by her on Khasra Nos. 1043 and 1044, situated in Village Shiliri (Mohal Mehli), Tehsil Shimla Rural, District Shimla, H.P.
2. Admittedly, petitioner is not recorded owner of the land whereupon her house is constructed. Her claim is that irrespective of ownership of land beneath her house, for fundamental right under Article 21 of Constitution of India, she is entitled for electricity connection.
3. Petitioner, for establishing her entitlement for electricity connection, has referred provisions of Electricity Act, 2003 and Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Licensee’s Duty for Supply of Electricity on Request) Regulation, 2004, (for short the “Electricity Act” and “HPERC”), wherein it is provided that applicant means the ‘owner or occupier of any premises’, who makes an application to the distribution licensee for supply of electricity. Petitioner has also relied upon judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court dated 22.10.2018 in CWP No. 2454 of 2018, titled as Madan Lal Vs. State of H.P. and others, wherein electricity and water connection was directed to be released to the applicant/petitioner therein, despite the fact that applicant/petitioner was encroacher, facing proceedings under Section 163 of H.P. Land Revenue Act for eviction.
4. Petition has been opposed by respondents on the ground that petitioner has alternative appropriate remedy for redressal of her grievance as jurisdiction to entertain such compliant is vested with the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (in short HPERC) under HPERC (Licensee’s Duty for Supply of Electricity on Request) Regulations, 2004, (in short HPE RC Regulations) framed under the Electricity Act, 2003 and on merits it is stated that petitioner has not been found to be owner of the land beneath the structure and, therefore, she is not entitled for electricity connection.
5. It is claimed by respondent that judgment in Madan Lal’s case supra (CWP No. 2454 of 2018) is not applicable in present case, as no issue of title is pending adjudication before any authority and it is ex facie clear that structure of petitioner is on Government land as per jamabandi.
6. It is further stand of respondents that Service Connection Order (SCO) was issued by the respondents as per Supply Code, 2009 (amended provision), but the moment, when the connection was to be released from the service main of the respondents, the neighbours of the petitioner resisted against laying of the service wire to the house of the petitioner and had filed representation before respondents that meter should not be installed with refusal to allow laying service wire through their private lands with further threat that respondents shall have to face consequences on releasing of electricity connection to the petitioner.
7. In Regulation 2 of HPERC Regulation, definition of applicant has been provided as under:-
(a) … … …
(b) … … …
(c) “applicant” means the owner or occupier of any premises who makes an application for the distribution licensee for supply of electricity.”
8. Regulation 3 of HPERC Regulation explains the duty of licensee to supply on request. Relevant portion thereof reads as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.