SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 278

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
Master Divesh Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 52 of 2020
Decided On : 13-08-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sh. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sh. Hemant Vaid and Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Deputy Advocate General.

Point of law : The mandate carried in sub-section (2) of Section 14 of the Act, does, unfold that the inquiry under Section 14 of the Act, shall become mandatorily concluded, by the Board concerned, within four months, from the date of production, of, the juvenile in conflict with law, before the Juvenile Justice Board.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code 1860 - Section 304A - Juvenile Justice Act 2015 - Section - 14, 17, 18 - Causing death by negligence - Inquiry by board regarding juvenile - Release - Petitioner contends that since the juvenile in conflict with law, allegedly committed a petty offence, punishable under Section 304-A of the IPC, and, when readings of the definition assigned to petty offences, as carried in sub-clause (45) of Section 2 of the Act.

Finding of the Court : If Court, validates the endeavor of the petitioner, it would be counter-productive, inasmuch as the victim is concerned, conspicuously, when as aforestated, the, drawing of capitalization, upon the mandate (supra) by the juvenile, is, aptly pureyable to him, only upon his not delaying proceedings, whereas, is un-available to him, upon mis-advises to him, by his counsel, to prolong the proceedings, through his seeking repeated exemptions, from his personal appearance(s) before the Board concerned, hence causing frustration of the mandate (supra). Consequently, making balance(s) interse the rights of the victim, and, of, the juvenile in conflict with law.

Result : Petition dismissed.

ORDER :

Through the instant petition, the juvenile in conflict with law, challenges an order, made under Section 14 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, by the Juvenile Justice Board, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. Through the impugned order, the Juvenile Justice Board, made the hereinafter extracted order :

    “18. Thus applying the principles laid down in Neeraj and others vs. State of Haryana 2005 (4) RCR Criminal 71 and in X Minor (through his elder brother vs. State Criminal Revisions Petition No. 24/2017 decided on 15.11.2011, and taking into consideration the fact that the provisions of Section 14 of the Junvenile Justice Act are directory and not mandatory and further taking into consideration the fact that the inquiry in the present case especially during the examination of the complainant on 4.6.2019 was delayed due to the non-appearance of the juvenile and further taking into consideration the seriousness of the allegations leveled against the juvenile, this Board does not deem it appropriate to terminate the inquiry pending adjudication before this Board. As far as the interest of the juvenile is concerned, the same can be looked into by the Board by speeding the inquiry and in the light of above discussion, the present application is dismissed”.

For adjudicating the import of the challenges made to the afore impugned order, it becomes incumbent, upon, this Court, to extract the mandate, carried in Section 14 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, provisions whereof are extracted hereinafter :

    “14. Inquiry by Board regarding child in conflict with law:

(1) Where a child alleged to be in conflict with law is produced before Board, the Board shall hold an inquiry in accordance with the provisions of this Act and may pass such orders in relation to such child as it deems fit under Sections 17 and 18 of this Act.

(2) The inquiry under this section shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of first production of the child before the Board, unless the period is extended, for a maximum period of two more months by the Board, having regard the circumstances of the case and after recording the reasons in writing for such extension.

(3) A preliminary assessment in case of heinous offences under Section 15 shall be disposed of by the Board within a period of three months from the date of first production of the child before the Board.

(4) If inquiry by the Board under sub-section (2) for petty offences remains inconclusive even after the extended period, the proceedings shall stand terminated:

PROVIDED that for serious or heinous offences, in case the Board requires further extension of time for completion of inquiry, the same shall be granted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, or, as the case may be, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, for reasons to be recorded in writing.

(5) The Board shall take the following steps to ensure fair and speedy inquiry namely:

(a) At the time of initiating the inquiry, the Board shall satisfy itself that the child in conflict with law has not been subjected to any ill-treatment by the police or by any other person, including a lawyer or probation officer and take corrective steps in case of such ill-treatment;

(b) In all cases under the Act, the proceedings shall be conducted in simple manner as possible and care shall be taken to ensure that the child, against whom the proceedings have been instituted, is given child friendly atmosphere during the proceedings;

(c) Every child brought before the Board shall be given the opportunity of being heard and participate in the inquiry;

(d) Cases of petty offences, shall be disposed of by the Board through summary proceedings, as per the procedure prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)

(e) Inquiry of serious offences shall be disposed of by the Board, by following the procedure, for trial in summons cases under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)

(f) Inquiry of heinous

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    SupremeToday

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top