IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
Jumla Jamindaran, Village Pangi & others - Petitioners
Versus
Jumla Jamindaran, Village Telangi & others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Petition Main (Original) No. 380 of 2017
Decided On : 24-08-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 read with Section 151 - Seeking amendment - Seeking quash of order - Exercising customary rights over suit land Application filed under Order 6, Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in Civil Suit plaintiffs, for declaration to the effect that plaintiffs have customary rights over the suit land and order to contrary passed by Settlement Collector is bad in law and liable to be set aside and the defendants t over the suit land - court of learned Senior Sub Judge, Kinnaur at Recong Peo, District Kinnaur, H.P., vide judgment held the suit to be beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of said Court and the plaint was returned for its proper presentation - suit was filed in the Court.
Finding of the Court: Basis of material before it, the view which has been taken by learned Court below is one of views which should have been - Court on basis of pleadings before it and any observations made in this order should not be construed as any adjudication viz-a-viz the rights of either of parties because observations which have been made by this Court in this order are only for the purpose of adjudication of present petition - It is further clarified that respondents herein who are not party - Appear before learned Court Registry of this Court is directed to forthwith returned back with the record of case Pending miscellaneous applications.
Result: Application is disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
By way of this petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of order dated 23.08.2017, passed by the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Kinnaur at Recong Peo, District Kinnaur, H.P., in a miscellaneous application filed under Order 6, Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in Civil Suit No.11-R/1 of 1999/2014, titled as Jumla Jamindaran Village Pangi & others Versus Jumla Jamindaran Village Telangi & others, by the private defendants therein, vide which, said application filed for amendment of the written statement was allowed by the learned Court below.
2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are as under:-
A Civil Suit stands filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs, for declaration to the effect that the plaintiffs have customary rights over the suit land and the order to the contrary passed by Settlement Collector is bad in law and liable to be set aside and the defendants have no right over the suit land.
3. Record demonstrates that earlier a suit was filed in the year 1984 by the plaintiffs and decreed on 26.06.1987. In appeal, the learned District Judge remanded the case to the learned Trial Court on the question of jurisdiction and the court of learned Senior Sub Judge, Kinnaur at Recong Peo, District Kinnaur, H.P., vide judgment dated 30.08.1994 held the suit to be beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the said Court and the plaint was returned for its proper presentation. Thereafter, the suit was filed in the Court of learned District Judge, Kinnaur, H.P., which was decreed on 03.10.2001. The defendants filed an appeal, i.e. RFA No.450 of 2001 before this Court, which appeal was allowed vide judgment dated 30.05.2014 and the matter was remanded back to the learned District Judge for decision afresh after impleading the State of Himachal Praesh as a defendant. The suit thereafter stood transferred to the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kinnaur, on account of the change of the pecuniary jurisdiction of the learned Courts. Thereafter, the State of Himachal Pradesh stood impleaded as a party defendant and written statement to the suit was filed by the newly added defendant, which is dated 24.09.2014. An application was filed under Order 6, Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the original defendants, seeking amendment in the written statement to the following effect:-
“a. That in preliminary objections add “new para 5” and further add words “That the suit of the plaintiffs is hopelessly time barred since the plaintiffs are challenging the order of settlement Collector decided on 02.09.1983 in the suit being filed on 23rd day of October, 1999, hence same is liable to be dismissed on this score only.”
b. In para 3 after the last word alleged add words “there is a passage having constructed by cutting rocks through Kacha Dhank, which have been used since time immemorial for to and fro to the suit land by khewatdarans of Village Telangi for exercising their customary rights.”
4. It was mentioned in the application that on account of inadvertence at the time of drafting the written statement, defendants could not put forth their plea of accessibility of the suit land through a path passing through ‘Kacha Dhank’, which stood constructed by cutting of rocks and which was in use for to and from the suit land by Khewatdarans of village Talangi for exercising customary rights over the suit land since time immemorial. It was further pleaded in the application that the challenge to the order of the Settlement Collector by way of a suit filed by the plaintiffs was time barred as the order stood passed by the Settlement Collector on 02.09.1983, whereas the suit stood filed on 23.10.1999, therefore, plea of limitation was sought to be taken. On these pleas, a prayer was made by the defendants for permission to amend the written statement. This application is dated 25.09.2014.
5. The
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.