JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The plaintiffs instituted a Civil Suit bearing No. 52/S/1 of 2000/93 before the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Kandaghat. In the afore civil suit, the plaintiff claimed the making of a declaratory decree, reliefs whereof become extracted hereinafter:-

“It is, therefore, prayed that a decree for declaration to the effect that the plaintiffs are four temples at four different places under four different Mohatmims and are four different entities having separate status, personalities and are four different juristic persons and the said plaintiffs have no concern with the personal property and ownership of the Mohatmims and are liable to declared entitled to four different units as such independently and revenue entries are liable to be corrected accordingly, and further mutations effect otherwise than the above said, the same are not binding upon the plaintiffs, the order of the authorities of Himachal Pradesh under H.P. Ceiling Act are illegal, inoperative, null and void and are beyond the purview of the provisions of the said Act and the plain