SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 373

SANDEEP SHARMA
Gian Chand – Appellant
Versus
Ashish Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
MR. PREM P. CHAUHAN, ADVOCATE, for the Appellant; MR. ANUP KUMAR RATTAN, ADVOCATE, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Instant criminal revision petition filed under S.397 read with S.401 CrPC, lays challenge to judgment dated 20.7.2019 passed by learned Sessions Judge Kullu, HP in Cr.Appeal No.06 of 2019, titled Gian Chand vs. Dharam Chand, affirming judgment and order of conviction dated8.3.2019 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Lahul & Spiti at Kullu in Cr. Complaint No. 03-1/2013, titled Dharam Chand vs. Gian Chand, whereby learned trial Court, while holding petitioner-accused (hereinafter, 'accused') guilty of having committed offence punishable under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter, 'Act') convicted and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay compensation of Rs.50,000/- to the respondent-complainant (hereinafter, 'complainant') and, in default of payment of compensation, to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month.

2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record, are that, respondent/complainant instituted a complaint under S. 138 of the Act in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lahul and Spiti at Kullu alleging therein that since the accused was well known to him and they were having

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top