SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 376

SANDEEP SHARMA
Gurdas Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijay Bhatia, Advocate, Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, Narender Thakur, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Sharma, J. - Being aggrieved with the issuance of communication, dated 20.4.2016 (Annexure A-1), issued under the signatures of Deputy Commissioner, Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh, whereby respondents while regularizing the services of the petitioner as Revenue Chowkidar in Patwar Circle, Rajali Banyala, reflected his date of retirement as 30.6.2016, petitioner approached the erstwhile H.P. Administrate Tribunal by way of Original Application No.3078 of 2016, which now stands transferred to this Court after abolishment of erstwhile H.P. Administrate Tribunal and stands registered as CWPOA No.7778 of 2019, praying therein following reliefs:-

"(i). That the impugned office order dated 20.04.2016(Annexure A-1) may kindly be quashed and set-aside and the respondents may kindly be restrained from retiring the applicant from the services on 30.06.2016.

(ii). That the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the applicant to continue in service till he attains the age of superannuation i.e.30.06.2022.

(iii). That the respondents may further be directed to regularize the services of the applicant w.e.f. 01.04.2012 with all consequential benefits like arrears etc."

2. C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top