SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 383

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Sunil Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Aruna Chauhan, Advocate, Hemant Vaid, Advocate, Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, Gaurav Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J. - The learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Theog, District Shimla, upon case No. 13-3 of 2006, as arose from a complaint made by the Food Inspector, under section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, (hereinafter referred to as, "the Act"), made an order of conviction upon the accused. Through a separate order drawn on 6.9.2007, he sentenced the accused to suffer simple imprisonment, of six months each, and, also sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- each, for the charge drawn under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Act. The learned Judicial Magistrate, through the afore drawn order also made a direction, that upon default of the accused, depositing the afore imposed fine upon them, thereupon, they shall further undergo simple imprisonment, for one month. However, the period of confinement, already undergone by the convicts during investigation and trial, was ordered to be set off, against the afore imposed sentence of imprisonment, upon each of the accused.

2. The verdict made by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Theog, District Shimla, was appealed by the aggrieved, before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shiml

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top