SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 363

SATYEN VAIDYA
Neelam Kumari & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Company – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, Jagdish Thakur, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Satyen Vaidya, J. - This appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award dated 19.12.2012 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court, Chamba, H.P. (for short 'Tribunal') in M.A.C. No. 72/12/11 whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants/claimants, was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants filed claim petition No.72/12/11 seeking compensation to the tune of Rs.8,00,000/- under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'Act') on account of death of Sh. Sunil Kumar S/o Sh. Dharam Pal in the capacity of his legal representatives.

3. It was stated in the claim petition that the deceased was the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident and he himself was driving the vehicle. The vehicle was insured with the respondent.

4. Respondent contested the petition on the grounds that the petition was not maintainable. Insured had intentionally made breaches of the terms and conditions of the policy. The petition under Section 166 of the Act was not maintainable in view of the provisions of Section 147 of the Act. The driver-cum-owner i.e. the deceased Sunil Kumar was not possess

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top