SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 356

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Ved Prakash & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Kamla Devi & Anr. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Bhupender Gupta, Advocate, Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate, Anaida Kuthiala, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. - The Plaintiffs are the appellants, who after having lost before both the Courts below, have filed the instant Regular Second Appeal. (Parties hereinafter shall be referred to as the 'Plaintiffs' and 'defendants').

2. The plaintiffs instituted a suit for declaration, injunction and in alternative for possession against the defendants before the learned Trial Court on the ground that the sale deeds dated 07.07.1995 and 28.12.1995 in favour of defendant No. 1, Smt. Kamla Devi are wrong, null and void and the defendants No. 1 and 2 be restrained from encroaching upon the land comprised in Khewat/Khatauni No. 179/272 Khasra No. 926 and 927 measuring 345.95 sq. meters, situated in Muhal Tarna, Mandi town, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the 'suit land').

3. The case of the plaintiffs as pleaded before the lower court is that Amar Chand had previously instituted Civil Suit No. 14 of 1990 for declaration against Girja Nand, Dhananjai and Smt. Titli Devi to the effect that the suit land was jointly owned and possessed by the parties. Said Civil Suit No. 14 of 1990 was dismissed on 13.12.1991 and it was held that Girja Nand had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top