SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 414

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SUNEEL AWASTHI
Chaman Singh – Appellant
Versus
Uco Bank & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. - The moot question in this petition is whether the period of 9 (nine) years, 10 (ten) months and 5 (five) days of services rendered by the petitioner can be rounded off by 10 (ten) years, so as to enable him for grant of pension.

2. This petition was earlier allowed vide judgment dated 27.06.2018 on the basis of the regulations framed by the respondents i.e. UCO Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995, more particularly, regulations 14 and 18.

3. However, later the bank filed a Review Petition No. 11 of 2019 before this Court on the ground that the respondents while filing reply had even though placed copy of regulations but the same was not complete and on this account, the review petition was allowed and the petition was directed to be restored to its original number.

4. The petitioner initially served in the Indian Army from 1973 to 1986 and was discharged from service on compassionate grounds. Thereafter, the petitioner was appointed as armed guard with the respondents at its branch at Kihar where he joined on 26.06.2006. The petitioner retired from the service of the bank on 30.04.2016 after rendering 9 (nine) years, 10 (ten) months and 5 (fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top