SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 390

JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Shadi Lal & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Kumar Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. N.K. Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge (Oral). - The sole respondent though stands served for 09.07.2021, however, none has put in appearance on his behalf on 09.07.2021, 16.07.2021, 24.07.2021 and even today i.e. 30.07.2021. Hence, the respondent is ordered to be proceeded ex parte.

2. The petitioners' application under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 05.10.2009 passed in Civil Suit No. 101/2009, has been dismissed by learned Courts below. Hence, the instant petition has been preferred by them under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

3(i). The civil suit was filed by the respondent against the petitioners for recovery of Rs.2,60,000/- alongwith interest. Petitioners contested the suit as defendants. The civil suit was initially pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Una. It was thereafter transferred to the Court of learned Civil Judge Junior Division Court Noil, Amb, District Una. H.P on account of enhancement in the pecuniary jurisdiction. On 18.09.2009, none appeared for the petitioners in the civil suit, hence, they were proceeded ex-parte. On 05.10.2009, an ex-part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top