SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 304

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of H P & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, Sumesh Raj, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ajay Mohan Goel, J. - This petition was initially filed as Original Application before learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, which after the abolition of the learned Tribunal has been transferred to this Court and registered as civil writ petition.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are as under:- The petitioner was engaged as a Driver on daily wage basis in Hamirpur Division of the Forest Department of the State. It is not in dispute that since his engagement and till the filing of the original application, which now stands transferred to this Court and registered as writ petition, the petitioner had put in 240 days work in each calendar year.

3. Petitioner approached erstwhile Tribunal earlier by way of original application No. 4909 of 2017, titled as Suresh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another, inter alia praying for his regularization as a Driver in the respondentdepartment, which original application stood disposed of by learned Tribunal in the following terms:-

"6. In view of the above, the original application is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid CWP No. 2735 of 2010 and the connected matters, with a directi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top