SANDEEP SHARMA
Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Arti – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sandeep Sharma, J. - Cmp No.2475 of 2020
By way of instant application filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC, permission has been sought by the applicant/appellant to place on record certified copy of zimni orders passed in the proceedings under S.125 CrPC filed by the respondent, as well as certified copy of process fee given by the respondent for the service of the appellant to demonstrate that the non-applicant/respondent-wife, was fully aware that the petitioner-husband resides in Sonepat, Haryana and not at the address given by her in the memo of petition filed by her for divorce in the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Haryana. Aforesaid prayer having been made by the applicant/appellant has been resisted by non- applicant/respondent by filing reply to the application, wherein, otherwise, factum with regard to furnishing of address of Sonepat, Haryana by respondent-wife in the proceedings filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C, has not been denied.
2. Having heard learned counsel representing the parties and perused the pleadings adduced on record in the instant application as well as documents intended to be placed on record, this Court is of the view that documents i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.