SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 346

SANDEEP SHARMA
Anjana Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Jhina Ram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Aditya Thakur, Advocate, H.S. Rana, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Sharma, J. - Instant regular second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC, lays challenge to the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2018, passed by the learned Additional District Judge-II Solan, District Solan, H.P., in CA No. 34 ADJ- II/13 of 2017, affirming the judgment and decree dated 7.7.2017, passed by the learned Civil Judge-II( Jr. Div.), Solan, District Solan, H.P., whereby civil suit bearing case No. 313/1 of 2014/10 having been filed by the respondent/plaintiff (herein after referred to as "the plaintiff") came to be decreed.

2. Precisely, facts of the case, as emerge from the record are that, plaintiff filed a suit for possession averring therein that plaintiff is absolute owner in possession of the land comprised in Khata/Khatauni No.84/267, Khasra No.1192/1074/890 and 1080/902, kitas 2, measuring 549 Sq. meters, situated in Mauza Dehun, Pargana Bharoli Khurd, Tehsil and District Una, alongwith building existing thereupon known as Geeta Bhawan. Plaintiff averred in the suit that appellant/defendant (herein after referred to as "the defendant") has no right, title or interest being absolute stranger over the suit property, which is the self acquired pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top