SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
Arun Sharma & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Bank Of India & Ors. - Respondents
C.W.P. No. 2895 of 2021
Decided On : 01-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Ashok K Sharma, Advocate, Y. Paul, Advocate, Arvind Sharma, Advocate, Rakesh Gautam, Advocate, Neeraj Rani, Advocate

The Court cannot interfere with the age limits prescribed in the Recruitment Rules by the employer unless it is so arbitrary that no prudent employer would have envisaged the same and included it in the Recruitment Rules and the same has been fixed without any rational basis and is manifestly unreasonable.

Headnote:

Age Limit - Recruitment Criteria - The State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Section 43 - Common Recruitment Process for Recruitment of Clerks - The fixation of age for recruitment of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales) by the respondent-Bank is in consonance with the Rules governing the recruitment to the posts in issue. The Court finds that the age limit has been fixed by applying a rational basis for uniformity, as observed in the Recruitment Policies of the respondent-Bank and other Nationalized Banks in the Country as well as the Reserve Bank of India. The Court cannot interfere with the age limits prescribed in the Recruitment Rules by the employer unless it is so arbitrary that no prudent employer would have envisaged the same and included it in the Recruitment Rules and the same has been fixed without any rational basis and is manifestly unreasonable.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought relief from an advertisement debarment for recruitment of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales) due to the prescribed age limit. The respondent-Bank defended the age criteria as per the Rules governing recruitment.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the age limit fixed by the respondent-Bank for recruiting Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales) was not arbitrary and was in line with the Recruitment Policies of the respondent-Bank and other Nationalized Banks in the Country as well as the Reserve Bank of India.

Issues: The main issue was the arbitrariness of the age limit prescribed for recruitment against the post of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales) by the respondent-Bank.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court cannot interfere with the age limits prescribed in the Recruitment Rules by the employer unless it is so arbitrary that no prudent employer would have envisaged the same and included it in the Recruitment Rules and the same has been fixed without any rational basis and is manifestly unreasonable.

Final Decision: The Court dismissed the writ petition, vacated any interim orders, and disposed of any miscellaneous applications with no order as to costs.

JUDGMENT

Ajay Mohan Goel, J. - By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:

"(i) That the impugned Advertisement dated 24.04.2021, Annexure P-1 where the petitioners have been debarred to apply and appear in the examination may kindly be quashed and set aside and petitioners may very kindly be allowed to apply and appear in the present examination.

(ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to produce the entire record pertaining to the eligibility criteria about the age limit as prescribed by the respondent for the various posts for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court qua the different age criteria for entrance test for recruitment of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales).

(iii) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the applicants."

2. The case of the petitioners is that vide Advertisement dated 27.04.2021 (Annexure P-1), online applications were invited by the respondent-Bank for recruitment of eligible candidates against the posts of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales). The dates for online registration of application and payment of fees, as mentioned in the Advertisement, were between 27.04.2021 to 17.05.2021, which the Court stands informed, were subsequently extended on account of COVID-19 pandemic. In all, around 5000 posts were advertised, including about 180 posts for various branches of the respondent-Bank in the State of Himachal Pradesh. The eligibility criteria prescribed in the advertisement was that a candidate ought to be not below the age of 20 years and not above 28 years as on 01.04.2021. The Court is purposely not referring to the other eligibility criterion mentioned in the Advertisement, because the age limit is the only bone of contention, as far as the grievance of the present petitioners is concerned. Their grievance in fact is that the fixation of maximum age limit for recruitment against the post of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales), as is reflected in the Advertisement, Annexure P-1, is arbitrary, which is borne out from the fact that the same Bank while issuing Advertisements against the posts of Pharmacist in Clerical Cadre as also Probationary Officers, has fixed the upper age limit as 30 years. Annexure P-2 appended with the petition is the Advertisement issued for recruitment of Pharmacist in Clerical Cadre and Annexure P-3 is the Advertisement issued by the respondentBank for recruitment of Probationary Officers.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioners are eligible to participate in the process of selection to the post in issue, as they possess the necessary educational qualifications, but they have been debarred from participating in the process on the basis of an arbitrary and irrational age criteria, which has been provided for in the advertisement. He has further submitted that the prescribed age is arbitrary, is further borne out from the fact that the respondent-Bank cannot be permitted to have different age brackets for recruitment of Clerical Cadres in the Bank, may be under different nomenclatures. On these basis, the petitioners have prayed for the reliefs already enumerated hereinabove.

4. The stand of the respondents is that the fixation of age for recruitment of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales), as is provided in the Advertisement is in consonance with the Rules, which govern the recruitment to the posts in issue. It is mentioned in the reply that as per the Bank Recruitment Policy, the minimum age for recruitment to the post in issue is 20 years and maximum age is 28 years, as on the cut off date. It is the stand of the respondent-Bank that the selection age criteria for the post of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales) is same and similar, as is prescribed in other Nationalized Banks in the Country and posts of Junior Associates (Customer Support & Sales) cannot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top