SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 489

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Sureshwar Thakur, Sandeep Sharma, JJ.
Takshila Private Industrial Training Institute - Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
C.W.P. No. 721 of 2021
Decided On : 01-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, Ashwani Sharma, Advocate, Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, Rajinder Kumar, Advocate

The central legal point established in the judgment is that existing institutes are not required to upgrade to a minimum of four trades before applying for affiliation of additional unit in already existing trade, as per the norms of affiliation prevalent in the year 2018.

Headnote:

Affiliation Norms - ITI - 2, 3.7.1, 4.2 - The court discussed the norms of affiliation prevalent in the year 2018, emphasizing that existing institutes are not required to upgrade to a minimum of four trades before applying for affiliation of additional unit in already existing trade. The court referred to the minutes of meetings of the DGT's committees and a judgment of the High Court of Delhi to support its interpretation of the norms. The court held that the requirement of a minimum of four trades for an existing institution to apply for additional units/trades is unsustainable.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner approached the court after being dissatisfied with the office memorandum dated 3.2.2021, issued by respondent No.4, which rejected the petitioner's request for an additional 4th base unit in Electrician Trade. The petitioner had previously obtained a favorable judgment from the Co-ordinate Bench of the Court, directing respondent No.3 to re-consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with applicable norms of affiliation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the reasons given by the respondents for rejecting the petitioner's case were not justified and were in total violation of affiliation norms. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to the additional 4th base unit with 3 shifts for Electrician Trade as per the Joint Committee report of NCVT Sub-committee.

Issues: The issues included the rejection of the petitioner's request for an additional 4th base unit in Electrician Trade, the compliance with the norms of affiliation, and the interpretation of the requirements for existing institutes to upgrade to a minimum of four trades before applying for affiliation of additional units/trades.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the norms of affiliation prevalent in the year 2018, as well as the minutes of meetings of the DGT's committees and a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. The court held that the requirement of a minimum of four trades for an existing institution to apply for additional units/trades is unsustainable.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, quashed the office memorandum dated 3.2.2021, and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for additional unit in terms of the report given by the Subcommittee without insisting upon the condition of having a minimum of four trades within a period of six weeks from the date of the judgment.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Sharma, J. - Being aggrieved and dis-satisfied with office memorandum dated 3.2.2021, (Annexure P-9), issued by respondent No.4 in purported compliance of judgment dated 8.1.2021, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 6128 of 2020, whereby respondent No.3 was directed to re-consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with applicable norms of affiliation, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. For having bird's eye view, necessary facts for adjudication of the instant case, are that the petitioner-Institute after its establishment in the year, 2011 got itself affiliated with National Council of Vocational Training (in short "NCVT") for Electrician Trade for 2 (1+1) unit. Four additional units 1+1+2 were approved in 2014, whereafter, again in the year, 2019 three more units 1+1+1 were approved in favour of the petitioner-Institute and as of today's date, petitioner-Institute is affiliated for total nine units in the Electrician trade. On 2.12.2019, online affiliation portal came to be opened up by respondent No.4 for registering ITIs aspiring to apply for extension of trades/units, for shifting as per TGT Norms and for new ITIs willing to start session. Pursuant to aforesaid initiative taken by respondent No.3, petitioner institute within a stipulated period, applied for affiliation of additional 4th base unit in Electrician trade. Sub Committee of NCVT headed by respondent No.2 conducted a joint inspection of petitioner-Institute under stages 1, II and III as provided in affiliation Norms of 2018 and after having found the petitioner institute eligible, recommended case of the petitioner for additional 4th base unit in Electrician trade vide letter dated 7.11.2020. On the basis of aforesaid recommendation of Sub- Committee of NCVT, the State council of Vocational Training (in short "SCVT"), granted affiliation to the petitioner institute for two shifts under SCVT Certificate, which is valid within the State. Based on the recommendation of NCVT Sub-committee, many aspirants applied for admission and were admitted in the institute, however, recommendation of Sub-committee NCVT was not accepted by the Recommendation Committee of respondent No.3. Recommendation Committee in its 16th meeting held on 25.11.2020, refused to recommend the affiliation of additional 4th base unit in Electrician Trade for petitioner-Institute. In the aforesaid background, petitioner approached this Court by way of CWP No. 6128 of 2020, praying therein to quash and set aside the report of Recommendation Committee of respondent No.3 qua the petitioner-Institute. Having found action of the respondents to be in total violation of affiliation norms, Division Bench of this court vide judgment dated 8.1.2021, passed following order:-

"In view of the above, we find that reasons as contained in the communication dated 9.12.2020/25.11.2020 (Annexure P-7) for rejecting the case of the petitioner seeking affiliation for additional 4th base Unit in Electrician Trade are not justified. Respondent No.3 has not considered the case of the petitioner for affiliation of additional 4th Base Unit in Electrician Trade in accordance with applicable Norms of Affiliation. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed. Annexure P-7, insofar as it pertains to rejection of the case of the petitioner is quashed and set aside. Respondent No.3 is directed to re-consider the case of the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law."

3. Pursuant to aforesaid direction issued by the Division Bench, matter again came to be re-considered by the Recommendation Committee of DGT in its 19th meeting held on 15.1.2021, wherein Recommendation Committee vide office memorandum order dated 3.2.2021, while reiterating that it is mandatory to apply for re-affiliation to those ITIs, which are affiliated for more than five years and I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top