SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 483

SURESHWAR THAKUR
State Of H. P. – Appellant
Versus
Simant Jaswal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Hemant Vaid, Advocate, T.S. Chauhan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J. - The accused became charged for commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, and, under Section 338 of the IPC. The learned trial Magistrate, through its verdict made on 19.03.2008, upon, Case No. 105/2 of 2005/2002, recorded an order of acquittal, vis-a-vis, the aforestated charges, as became drawn against the accused.

2. The State of Himachal Pradesh, becomes aggrieved from the afore made verdict of acquittal. Consequently, for constituting an onslaught thereon, it has cast the extant appeal before this Court.

3. Briefly stated the facts of the prosecution case are that on 1.3.2002, complainant Kaudu Ram recorded his statement under Section 154 of the Cr.P.C., before the Police, to the effect that on 1.3.2002 at about 11.15 a.m, he was standing near the road at Baddu village along with other people. At that time a scooter driven by the accused, bearing No. HP-23- 3012 came from Ghumarwin side. It was being driven by the accused in a rash and negligent manner, and, resultantly it struck against the complainant, owing to which he sustained injuries on his person. The complainant was taken to CHC, Ghumarwin. On the basis of the statement of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top