SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 482

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Jagdish Kumar & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
C.W.P. No. 3047 of 2020
Decided On : 23-06-2021

Advocates appeared:
A.K. Gupta, Advocate, Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate

The judgment established that the minimum educational qualification prescribed for direct recruits may not be applicable to employees being inducted from a different category, and the denial of appointment based on such qualification can be deemed arbitrary and violative of Constitutional mandate.

Headnote:

Water Guards - Induction - Recruitment and Promotion Rules of Pump Attendants - Rule 7, Rule 10, Rule 11, Rule 15, Rule 15-A - The court held that the minimum educational qualification prescribed in Rule 7 for direct recruits is not applicable to Water Guards to be inducted as Pump Attendants. The denial of appointment to the Water Guards based on educational qualification was deemed arbitrary, irrational, and violative of Constitutional mandate.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners sought induction as Pump Attendants after completing 12 years of service as Water Guards. The government had imposed an educational qualification condition for their induction, which the petitioners contested.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the minimum educational qualification prescribed for direct recruits was not applicable to the petitioners. It also noted that the nature of work performed by Water Guards should be treated as work experience to fulfill the eligibility criteria for the post of Pump Attendant.

Issues: The main issue was whether the minimum educational qualification prescribed in the Recruitment and Promotion Rules applied to the induction of Water Guards as Pump Attendants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the minimum educational qualification was not applicable to the Water Guards for induction as Pump Attendants. It also emphasized that the denial of appointment based on educational qualification was arbitrary and violative of Constitutional mandate.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to engage the petitioners as Pump Attendants from retrospective dates and extend all consequential benefits, including seniority and monetary benefits.

JUDGMENT

Vivek Singh Thakur, J. - Petitioners have approached this Court for their induction on completion of 12 years of service as Water Guards (Jal Rakshaks) with three years experience of working with Pump Motors and Electrical accessories against the post of Pump Attendants on contractual basis, like other Water Guards, after striking down condition of educational qualification imposed by respondents for their such induction in erstwhile Department of Irrigation and Public Health now Jal Shakti Vibhag (JSV).

2. Undisputed facts in present case are that petitioners have been permitted to be appointed by concerned Gram Panchayats in the process of transfer of Rural Drinking Water Supply Scheme (RWSSs) after complying due process for operation and maintenance of water supply schemes below the storage tanks. Appointment of petitioners was made on the basis of recommendations of Selection Committee constituted by the Government after adopting a selection process based on interview and other parameters as per guidelines of transfer of operation and maintenance of Rural Water Supply Scheme to Panchyati Raj Institutions (PRIs). Vide notification/communication dated 17th July, 2019, (Annexure R-1) respondents-State has framed a policy to deploy and appoint Water Guards appointed under Assured Rural Water Supply Scheme (ARWSP) now National Rural Drinking Programme (NRDWP) against vacant posts of Pump Attendants in accordance with provisions contained in Recruitment and Promotion Rules (R&P Rules) of Pump Attendants, purely on contract basis in erstwhile Irrigation and Public Health Department now Jal Shakti Vibhag.

3. During pendency of present Writ Petition, a communication dated 19.6.2020 was sent by Engineer-in-Chief JSV to Secretary JSV to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, stating therein that 1376 posts of various categories had been converted into posts of Pump Attendants and 945 Jal Rakshaks (Water Guards), fulfilling criteria of Recruitment and Promotion Rules with 12 years complete service, had been appointed as Pump Attendants Class-IV on contract basis, whereas 431 posts were lying vacant and further that 463 Jal Rakshaks, who had completed 12 years service as on 31.12.2018, but not fulfilling the educational qualification criteria prescribed in Recruitment and Promotion Rules, could not be appointed in the category of Pump Attendants Class-IV and, therefore, in this communication, necessary direction/approval of the Government for one time relaxation in Recruitment and Promotion Rules to appoint/induct aforesaid Jal Rakshaks as Pump Attendants on contract basis, was sought.

4. For the aforesaid communication dated 19.6.2020, vide order dated 31.3.2020, Secretary JSV to the Government of Himachal Pradesh was directed to impart instructions with regard to stand of the Government regarding aforesaid recommendation/request made by department for relaxation in Recruitment and Promotion Rules. In response thereto learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 2.6.2021 received from the office of Secretary (JSV), stating therein that matter has been examined in consultation with Personnel/Finance Departments and both Departments have expressed inability to concur with the proposal of the Administrative Department and, therefore, Government has decided to reject the said proposal and has rejected the same.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners and other similarly situated persons are serving as Water Guards since more than 12 years and are having sufficient experience of working with Pump Motor and Electrical accessories and, therefore, for their conversion to the establishment of JSV as contract Pump Attendant, minimum educational qualification prescribed in Recruitment and Promotion Rules is not applicable to them. According to him, educational qualification is to be taken into consideration at the time of initial appointment, but not on conversion of service of employees

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top