SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 481

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Vishamber Isiah Striesand – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N.S. Chandel, Advocate, Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, Hemant Vaid, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J. - The extant bail application has been instituted under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Through, the extant bail application, the petitioner seeks his being granted, the, facility of bail in connection with FIR No. 30, of 17.2.2017, lodged under Sections 20 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, at Police Station Manali, District Kullu, H.P. The seizure as made from his alleged conscious and exclusive possession weighs commercial quantity thereof.

2. Earlier, the petitioner had cast Cr.MP(M) No. 198 of 2019 before this Court. The afore Cr.MP(M) No. 198 of 2019 was dismissed by this Court on 13.03.2019. The bail petitioner challenged the afore made order by this Court, upon, Cr.MP (M) No. 198 of 2019, through his instituting SLP (Crl.) No. 4047 of 2019 before the Hon'ble Apex Court. The Hon'ble Apex Court declined to interfere with the verdict made by this Court, on 13.03.2019, upon, Cr.MP(M) No. 198 of 2019. The verdict made by the Hon'ble Apex Court, upon, SLP (Crl.) No. 4047 of 2019, on 08.05.2019 is extracted hereinafter:-

"We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. Consequently, the sp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top