SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 516

ANOOP CHITKARA
Rajiv Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijender Katoch, Advocate, Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, Ram Lal Thakur, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. - Petitioner who is in custody under Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), w.e.f. 9.4.2021, for possessing 334 grams of charas (Cannabis), and has come up before this Court under Section 439 of CrPC, seeking bail, on the grounds that the quantity of contraband allegedly seized is intermediate quantity and does not restrict bail, because the quantity greater than 1 kg of charas, falls in the category of the commercial quantity; hence the restrictions for bail imposed in S. 37 of NDPS Act, do not apply, and in the present case he is in custody for a considerable time.

2. Earlier, the petitioner had filed the following bail petitions:

(a) Bail Application Nos. 56 of 2021 and 58 of 2021 was filed before the Court of learned Special Judge, Hamirpur and the same stood dismissed on 17.5.2021.

3. In Para 7 of the bail application, the petitioner declares having no criminal history. The status report also does not mention any criminal past of the accused.

4. Briefly, the allegations against the petitioner are that on 9.4.2021 the police officials were patrolling in their jurisdiction. At around 6:50 pm they noticed one Alto car. The police

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top