SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 508

ANOOP CHITKARA
Rajinder – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mandeep Chandel, Advocate, Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, Ram Lal Thakur, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. - On allegations of possession and sale of 954 grams of Charas, which is an intermediate quantity, the petitioner, apprehending arrest, came up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC, seeking anticipatory bail.

2. A perusal of the petition reveals that the petitioner straightaway filed the bail petition before High Court, which is permissible given the decision of a three Judges Bench of HP High Court, in Mohan Lal v Prem Chand, (1980) AIR H.P. 36 , (Para 9 & 15), wherein the Full bench holds that a person can directly apply for an anticipatory bail or regular bail to the High Court without first invoking the jurisdiction of the Sessions Judge.

3. In Para 18 of the bail application, the petitioner declares having no criminal history relating to the offences prescribing sentence of seven years and more, or when on conviction, the sentence imposed was more than three years. The status report also does not mention any criminal past of the accused.

4. Briefly, the allegations against the petitioner are that on 17.5.2021, the police officials of Police Station, Sadar Bilaspur were patrolling at Chandigarh-Manali highway. At about 4:50 a.m., one car came which w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top