IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SATYEN VAIDYA, JJ.
SMT. MEENAKSHI SHARMA, W/O LATE SH. PRAVEEN SHARMA - Appellant
Vs.
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY - Respondent
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3633 OF 2020
Decided On : 03-12-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 32 and 226 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 154, 156, 157, 157(2), 166, 167 - Rule of law – Procedure for investigation - Empowers police to investigate cognizable offences without prior authorization or orders - Petitioner is widow of deceased, was found unconscious on a steep hill at a place known as “Kundu Nallah,” within jurisdiction of Police Post, under Police Station - He was removed to Regional Hospital, Solan but was declared brought dead - Later it was revealed from post mortem examination that deceased had suffered antimortem ribs fracture involving 4th, 8th ribs besides ten numbers external injuries - Cause of death was opined as “irreversible hemorrhage shock secondary to blunt trauma sustained to thorax region” - Whether or not such power should be exercised but time and again it has been reiterated that such an order is not to be passed as a matter of routine or merely because a party has leveled some allegations against local police - Whether transfer should or should not be ordered rests on Court's satisfaction - Whether facts and circumstances of a given case demand such an order – Held, Respondents are directed to forthwith handover all records pertaining to the case to Central Bureau of Investigation, through its Superintendent of Police, Railway Board Building, whereupon, CBI shall register a case for commission of cognizable offence under appropriate provisions of penal law(s) and shall investigate same in accordance with law with sufficient promptitude, keeping in view peculiar facts and circumstances of case - Court deem it fit and proper, keeping in view facts of case, to direct Principal Secretary Home, Government of Himachal Pradesh to get conduct and role, of police officials i.e. concerned Superintendent of Police in dealing with the matter detailed hereinabove, enquired from an officer not below the rank of Inspector General of Police particularly keeping in view dictum of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari (supra) - Enquiry shall be completed expeditiously and on priority and in any case not later than and compliance report shall positively be submitted to this Court - Petition allowed
ORDER :
The instant petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:
ii. To pass an order for the time bound investigation of the case and to monitor the investigation of the case and to monitor the investigation of the same case.
iii. To direct the investigating agency to register an FIR in the case mentioned above on the basis of the Rapat No. 15 dated 9.6.2020 Annexure P1”.
2. The petitioner is widow of deceased Praveen Sharma. On 9.6.2020 Parveen Sharma, aged about 32 years, was found unconscious on a steep hill at a place known as “Kundu Nallah,” near Pairvi Pul, Sanaura, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Sirmour, H.P., within the jurisdiction of Police Post, Yashwant Nagar under Police Station, Rajgarh, District Sirmour, H.P. He was removed to Regional Hospital, Solan but was declared brought dead. Later it was revealed from post mortem examination that the deceased had suffered antimortem ribs fracture involving 4th, 8th ribs besides ten numbers external injuries. The cause of death was opined as “irreversible hemorrhage shock secondary to blunt trauma sustained to thorax region”.
3. Petitioner approached this Court after about three months from the incident for the reliefs as noticed above. Grievance of the petitioner is that the police despite having noticed circumstances pointing towards commission of cognizable offence, failed to discharge its statutory duty under Sections 154 and 157 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “Code”).
4. As per petitioner, her husband was found in unconscious state at a secluded place far away from his house, which by no stretch of imagination could be said to be a normal circumstance. Even though deceased Praveen Sharma was declared brought dead, the police for the reasons best known to it did not consider it appropriate to register a case under Section 154 of the Code. Petitioner further alleged having made complaints in writing to the SHO as well as to the Superintendent of Police, Sirmour at Nahan, but without any result.
5. Respondents came forward with the plea that a DDR Nos 11 and 15 were recorded at Police Post Yashwant Nagar on 9.6.2020. As per respondents, a detailed inquiry was conducted. Post mortem of deceased was got conducted firstly at Regional Hospital Solan, on 10.6.2020 and subsequently at IGMC, Shimla, on 12.6.2020. The samples preserved during the post mortem were sent for chemical analysis and report was received on 5.8.2020. It is maintained that the doctors after post mortem had opined the case of death to be the result of “irreversible hemorrhage shock secondary to blunt trauma sustained to thorax region”. The said report was finally confirmed by the doctors even after receipt of report of chemical analysis from State Forensic Science Laboratory (SFSL). It is further stated that the police had thoroughly investigated the matter and had even sought the opinion of forensic expert by getting the spot inspected from them. The forensic experts also are stated to have opined “the topography of spot, injuries on the body were consistent with a case of fall from steep hill of Nalla”. Thus, the police maintained the hypothesis that deceased had a fall from the hill, which caused his death.
6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the records.
7. The petition was filed on 11.9.2020. Initially petitioner had impleaded State through its Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary Home and Superintendent of Police, Nahan as respondents. As first response, a status report dated 25.9.2020 was fled in this court under the signatures of Station House Officer, Rajgarh (SHO). Later a reply dated 12.10.2020 under the signatures of Superintendent of Police (SP), Nahan was filed and lastly newly added respondent ASI, Amar Dutt Sharma (ASI) also filed his personal affidavit dated 1.10.
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh
State of West Bengal and others vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights
K.V. Rajendran vs. Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone
Mithilesh Kumar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan and others (2015) 9 SCC 795
Arnab Ranjan Goswami vs. Union of India and others (2020) 14 SCC 12
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.