SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 627

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SATYEN VAIDYA, J.
Jashwinder Singh @ Rodha S/o Raj Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 2310 of 2021
Decided On : 24-12-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vinod Chauhan.
For the Respondent: Rajinder Dogra.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 439 – Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 - Section 15, 25, 29 and 37 – Drugs – Poppy husk - Police officials of Police Station, H.P. were on patrol duty - Their vehicle was stopped by two laborer at distance of about 300 meters from Auto towards Kullu - They were working at four lane construction site and had disclosed that they had noticed three persons alighting from of a car and running towards river side - A car was found parked nearby - Registration number of car was noticed with help of search light and it was also found that a gunny bag was lying on rear seat of car - Search was conducted for persons who had left car - Two persons, including petitioner were apprehended at bank of river - They disclosed that car belonged to one - On search of the car, total five gunny bags were recovered containing 65.720 kg poppy husk - Petitioner along with his companion, named said one were arrested - Third accused is stated to be absconding - It is also mentioned in status report that petitioner is already an accused in case registered vide FIR at Police Station, District Ludhiana, Punjab under Section 15 of NDPS Act – Held, petitioner to succeed in bail has to cross another legal barrier created by Section 37 of Act by satisfying Court that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail - To satisfy the conscience of this Court as to aforesaid requirements of law, it was incumbent on petitioner to have placed on record such material as to justify his impeccable antecedents - Petitioner has failed to satisfy this requirement and nothing has been produced on record to satisfy Court as to the antecedents of petitioner - There is not even a whisper to explain presence of petitioner at spot from where he was apprehended - On other hand, status report submitted by respondent makes a mention about involvement of petitioner in an earlier case under NDPS Act, as noticed - This being so, the likelihood of petitioner committing another offence while on bail, cannot be ruled out - In view of above discussion, petitioner is held not entitled for bail and petition is accordingly dismissed.

ORDER :

1. This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, delivered the following: Petitioner is accused in a case registered vide FIR No. 36 of 2021, dated 16.02.2021, registered at Police Station Aut, District Mandi, H.P. under Section 15, 25, 29 of NDPS Act.

2. Petitioner has prayed for grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on the ground that he has been falsely implicated. No recovery has been effected from him. Investigation has been completed and there is no legal evidence to connect the petitioner with alleged offence. He undertakes to abide by all the conditions as may be imposed for grant of his bail.

3. In response, respondent has opposed the bail application and has submitted the summary of facts and investigation carried out by way of status report. The investigation is already complete and the Challan stands filed which is pending adjudication before the learned Special Judge-II, Mandi. Charges have not yet been framed.

4. Perusal of status report reveals that on 16.02.2021, the Police officials of Police Station Aut, District Mandi, H.P. were on patrol duty. At about 3:00 A.M. their vehicle was stopped by two labourers at the distance of about 300 meters from Aut towards Kullu. They were working at four lane construction site and had disclosed that they had noticed three persons alighting from of a car and running towards river side. A car was found parked nearby. The registration number of the car was noticed with the help of search light and it was also found that a gunny bag was lying on the rear seat of the car. Search was conducted for the persons who had left the car. At about 7:15 A.M. two persons, including the petitioner were apprehended at the bank of river. They disclosed that the car belonged to Kulwant Singh. On search of the car, total five gunny bags were recovered containing 65.720 kg poppy husk. The petitioner along with his companion, named Bhola Singh @ Kiddu, were arrested. The third accused named Kulwant Singh is stated to be absconding. It is also mentioned in the status report that petitioner is already an accused in case registered vide FIR No. 51/2020, dated 12.06.2020 at Police Station Dohra, District Ludhiana, Punjab under Section 15 of NDPS Act.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent/State and have also gone through the contents of the status report. The prayer for bail of the petitioner has been vehemently opposed by learned Senior Additional Advocate General representing the State.

6. Admittedly, petitioner was not identified by anyone to be the same person, who had abandoned the car and ran towards the river. Merely, because the petitioner was found on the banks of river in the morning hours, cannot be a credible circumstance to link him with the alleged offence. On pointed query to respondent, it has been stated that the car was found unlocked at the time Police had found the same parked on road at first instance. It being so, the recovery of contraband had been made by the police in absence of the petitioner. It is not the case of the respondent that it was the petitioner and his companion Bhola Singh @ Kiddu, who were found in possession of key of the vehicle to connect them with alleged offence. Petitioner is not the registered owner of the vehicle. Nothing has been produced on record by respondent to show any relationship of the petitioner with the registered owner of the car.

7. In the teeth of Section 37 of N.D.P.S. Act, accused can be released on bail in cases involving commercial quantity of contraband, if all three conditions prescribed in said Section viz. opportunity of opposing the bail to the prosecutor, recording of satisfaction by the Court to the effect that there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused not guilty of such offence and that the accused was not likely to commit the offence during the period of bail. The bare language of Section 37 of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top