SANDEEP SHARMA
Kamla Devi, Widow of Sh. Kansu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Sumer Chand, Son of Meen Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Instant appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, amended upto date (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) lays challenge to order dated 29.01.2019, passed by learned Commissioner, for, Employees Compensation, Court No.1, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmour, H.P. in Case No. 2/2 of 2014 CIS No.9/2014, whereby learned Commissioner below, while allowing the claim petition having been filed by appellant/petitioner (hereinafter referred to as ‘appellant’) under Section 3 of the Act, held her entitled to compensation to the tune of Rs.5,33,925/- along with simple interest @ 12% per annum, on account of death of workman Hem Raj, payable by respondent No.2/Insurance Company. Besides aforesaid amount of compensation, learned Commissioner below also held appellant entitled to sum of Rs.1,14,071/- on account of penalty and interest payable by respondent No.1, i.e. owner of vehicle bearing No.HP-01N-0237.
2. Precisely, the facts as emerge from the record are that the appellant being dependent and legal heir of deceased Hem Raj, filed a petition under Section 3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.