IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
MS. Sarita Devi, D/O Shri Puran Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 1420 OF 2019
Decided on : 10-11-2021
Promotion - Scale Stenographer - Petitioner was appointed as Steno Typist in the Directorate of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, on recommendations of HP Public Service Commission - Petitioner joined against post as detailed herein and she was promoted to post of Jr. Scale Stenographer in terms of R&P Rules for the post of Jr. Scale Stenographer in Food and Supplies, vide government notification - In case at hand, respondent department before promoting petitioner to post of Jr. Scale Stenographer also took her option as is evident from Annexure R-1 adduced on record by respondents along with their reply - Consequent upon aforesaid promotion, petitioner joined as Jr. Scale Stenographer and during her such posting, she filed representation (Annexure P-3 ) to department stating therein that since she is working as Jr. Scale Stenographer on probation, she is eligible for promotion as Junior Auditor - Such request of her was not accepted by department and department vide communication apprised petitioner that there is no provision available in the R&P Rules for promotion of Jr. Scale Stenographer to the post of Junior Auditor – Held, record made available to this court clearly reveals that after petitioner’s being reverted to the post of Steno Typist from post of Jr. Scale Stenographer, four posts of Junior Auditor were available in department, against which, petitioner could be considered for promotion - Record/Noting, made available to this court clearly reveals that petitioner after being reverted to post of Jr. Scale Stenographer specifically made an option that she be promoted to post of Junior Auditor and at that time, sufficient posts of Junior Auditor were available in department - Aforesaid noting further reveals that promotion to post of Junior Auditor was sought to be denied to petitioner on ground that nomenclature of post of Junior Auditor stands changed to Senior Assistant - No doubt, vide notification (Annexure P-8), cadre of Junior Auditor merged with that of Senior Assistant, but at time of making representation for promotion to the post of Junior Auditor by the petitioner, posts of Junior Auditor were available upto 4.10.2012, as is clearly evident from record made available to this court and as such, promotion to post of Junior Auditor could not have been denied to the petitioner on the ground of merger - learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that petitioner, who is on the verge of retirement, is only interested in her promotion to higher post and she would be content and satisfied in case benefit of promotion as is being claimed by her to higher post is given to her on notional basis till the date of merger of two cadres - Present petition is allowed.
ORDER :
1. Petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings, praying therein for following main reliefs:
“i) That the impugned memo dated 28th July, 2014 (Annexure P-14) issued by the Respondent No.2, may kindly be quashed and set aside and the petitioner be allowed option for her promotion as Jr. Auditor/ Senior Asstt. from the due date with all consequential benefits..
ii) That the respondent No.2 may kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner for her promotion as Jr. Auditor/now designated as Senior Assistant under the provisions of R&P Rules, 1973 (Annexure P-2) from the date her juniors have already been promoted.
iii) That the promotion order dated 18.1.2014 (Annexure P-12) as Jr. Scale Stenographer may kindly be declared null & Void.”
2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record are that the petitioner was appointed as Steno Typist in the Directorate of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Himachal Pradesh, in September, 1996 on the recommendations of HP Public Service Commission, Shimla. The petitioner joined against the post as detailed herein above on 19.9.1996 and thereafter, she was promoted to the post of Jr. Scale Stenographer in terms of R&P Rules for the post of Jr. Scale Stenographer in the Food and Supplies, vide government notification No.FDS-A(3)-4-99 dated 22.11.2003. As per aforesaid R&P Rules, wherever there are more than one channel for the promotion, option shall be taken from the person being considered for promotion. In the case at hand, respondent department before promoting the petitioner to the post of Jr. Scale Stenographer also took her option dated 27.5.2008 as is evident from Annexure R-1 adduced on record by the respondents alongwith their reply. Consequent upon aforesaid promotion, petitioner joined as Jr. Scale Stenographer on 25.9.2009 and during her such posting, she filed representation dated 19.10.2010 (Annexure P-3 ) to the department stating therein that since she is working as Jr. Scale Stenographer on probation, she is eligible for promotion as Junior Auditor. However, such request of her was not accepted by the department and department vide communication dated 25.11.2020 (Annexure P-4) apprised the petitioner that there is no provision available in the R&P Rules for promotion of the Jr. Scale Stenographer to the post of Junior Auditor.
3. Since prayer of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Auditor was not accepted by the department, she vide communication dated 31.5.2011, requested the department to revert her back to the post of Steno Typist (Annexure P-5). Vide office order dated 4.7.2011, Directorate of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs reverted the petitioner to the post of Steno Typist, against which, she was initially appointed in September, 1996. On 17.1.2012, petitioner by way of representation represented to the department that since she stands reverted to the psot of Steno Typist and she is number one in the seniority of Steno Typist, her case may be considered for promotion to the post of Junior Auditor (Annexure P-7), however, fact remains that aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner never came to be decided, rather remained pending for one reason or the other and in the meantime, Government of Himachal Pradesh vide notification dated 4.10.2012, ordered for merger of the cadre of Junior Auditor with that of Senior Assistant (Annexure P-8). Petitioner again vide representation dated 28.12.2012 (Annexure P-9), requested the department to promote her to the post of Junior Auditor, but such prayer of her was not paid any heed. Interestingly, department totally ignoring the fact that petitioner was earlier promoted to the post of Steno Typist in September, 1996 and thereafter, she herself sought reversion from the post of Jr. Scale Stenographer, again called upon the petitioner to give option for her promotion to the post of Jr. Scale Stenographer. Vide order dated 18.1.2014, department once again
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.