SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 535

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.
Yashwant Singh, S/o. Late Sh. Jia Lal - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh, Through Secretary Urban Development Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 4115 of 2020
Decided On : 28-12-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sh. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, Alongwith Sh. Rajesh Kumar.
For the Respondents:Ms. Reeta Thakur, Sh. Raju Ram Rahi, Deputy Advocate General.

Headnote:

Recruitment & Promotion Rules - Right to Information Act, 2005- Service matter - Post of Superintendent Grade-II -Promotion - SC/ST/OBC and General in Roster – Seeking direction to consider his case for promotion to post of Superintendent Grade-II after completion of six years service as a Senior Assistant alongwith all consequential benefits, including seniority, continuity, annual increments, earned leave and all other consequential benefits including arrears accruing thereon on this account - Held, a post cannot be kept vacant for indefinite period or long period in anticipation of availability of a candidate of a particular category, who is not eligible/available on the date of vacancy or date of filling said vacancy. Promotion is incident of service, which may occur or may not happen in a service career of a person. It is a settled law that right to consider for promotion against available post, is a fundamental right but promotion is not a fundamental right - On seniority he was to be placed below Godavari Sharma and Suresh Kumar Sharma. Thereafter, against next post becoming available in July, 2019 petitioner was to be considered and on his promotion, he was to be assigned seniority above Hira Nand being senior to him in the feeder cadre for reason that Hira Nand would not have been promoted to next cadre of Superintendent Grade-I prior to July, 2019 as persons, seniors to him in cadre of Superintendent Grade-II, were already there available for consideration of promotion to post of Superintendent Grade-I and moreover post of Superintendent Grade-I was not available and on promotion of petitioner against Roster Point-12 before further promotion of Hira Nand to the next cadre, being senior in feeder cadre petitioner ought to have been placed above Hira Nand in seniority - Respondent No.2-Corporation is directed to consider the case of petitioner and others eligible candidates serving in feeder category for the post of Superintendent Grade-II - Petition is disposed of

JUDGMENT :

Petitioner has approached this Court, seeking direction to consider his case for promotion to the post of Superintendent Grade-II after completion of six years service as a Senior Assistant on 03.09.2017, alongwith all consequential benefits, including seniority, continuity, annual increments, earned leave and all other consequential benefits including arrears accruing thereon on this account.

2. Undisputed facts in present case are that petitioner is serving as a Senior Assistant in the Municipal Corporation, Shimla (hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation’). Next promotional avenue available to him is the post of Superintendent Grade-II. There are six posts of Superintendent Grade-II in the Corporation. Appointment/promotion to the post of Superintendent Grade-II is governed by 13 Point Roster. Before 2015, exercise of power by the Corporation was under cloud, but after 2015, the Corporation has been declared appointing authority for the posts, in reference, in present petition. Therefore, Corporation has started to maintain Roster (13 Point) for the post of Superintendent Grade-II w.e.f. 29.05.2015. Roster being maintained by the Corporation, supplied to the petitioner under Right to Information Act, 2005, has been placed on record as Annexure A-7 with rejoinder and the same is not disputed by the respondents. It is also admitted fact that on 29.05.2015 all six posts were occupied by incumbents posted against those posts. As per 13 Point Roster, first six posts are to be allotted to and filled by Un-Reserved category and thereafter first vacancy shall be against 7th point in Roster and the said vacancy shall go to Scheduled Caste category and, thereafter, again vacancies from 8 to 13 are to be provided for Un-Reserved category, i.e. open for all, i.e. General, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe. On 29.05.2015, all six posts were occupied and out of them first and sixth posts were occupied by Scheduled Caste candidates on the basis of their seniority and remaining four posts were occupied by General category candidates. But all candidates had consumed first six Roster points available for Un-Reserved.

3. In Annexure A-7 plotting of appointment to the post of Superintendent Grade-II as per 13 Point Roster is as under:-

    Table-A

Superintendent Grade-II= 6 Posts

Date of vacancy

Roster Point

Category of Roster Point

Date of promotion

Names of promottees

Further promotion/ retirement

29.05.2015

1

UR

29.05.2015

Sh. Bhagi Ram (SC)

31.08.2015 retired

29.05.2015

2

UR

29.05.2015

Sh. Jai Prakash Sharma

31.03.2017 retired

29.05.2015

3

UR

29.05.2015

Sh. Harpal Singh

31.03.2017 retired

29.05.2015

4

UR

29.05.2015

Sh. Diwan Chand

31.01.2016 retired

29.05.2015

5

UR

29.05.2015

Smt. Anita Sharma

31.08.2016 retired

29.05.2015

6

UR

29.05.2015

Smt. Ram Kali (SC)

09.09.2019 promoted as Supdt. Grade-I

 

7

SC

 

 

 

31.08.2015

8

UR

18.06.2016

Raksha Devi (SC)

Retired on 30.06.2019

31.01.2016

9

UR

18.06.2016

Durga Dass

Promoted as Superintendent Grade-I on 09.09.2019

31.08.2016

10

UR

22.09.2017

Godawari Sharma

Retired on 31.01.2020

31.03.2017

11

UR

22.09.2017

Suresh K. Sharma

Promoted as Supdt.Grade-I on 23.10.2020

31.03.2017

 

 

 

 

 

4. Person appointed against first post, namely Bhagi Ram belonging to Scheduled Caste category, but posted against Un-Reserved vacancy on the basis of his seniority, retired on 31.08.2015 and person posted against Roster Point 4 namely Diwan Chand retired on 31.01.2016 and, resultantly, two vacancies were available to be filled in against Roster Points 7 and 8. Roster Point 7 was reserved for Scheduled Caste, whereas Roster Point 8 onwards up to Roster Point 13 were available as Un-Reserved Roster Poin

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon Back to top