SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 552

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
Ravi Kumar S/o Sh. Hari Ram - Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 2017
Decided On : 15-12-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sh Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sh. Arvind Sharma, Additional Advocate General

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2001 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Recovery of charas - Contravention in relation to cannabis plant and cannabis – Appeal against conviction - Police officials were on Nakabandi and traffic checking duty accused came walking from side of Kheri side carrying back on his right shoulder - On seeing policy party he got scared and had tried to run back. On suspicion he was apprehended - On search, polythene envelope was found containing in it a black coloured substance in shape of sticks and balls. It was identified to be Charas - Charas was weighed with help of a traditional weighing scale and it was found to be 1 Kg - Charas was then put back in the same polythene envelope and envelope was then put back in the same carry bag - Held, It is manifest from Section 20(i) of NDPS Act that even though a maximum sentence of five years RI and a fine of upto Rs. 50,000/- was prescribed but there was no minimum mandatory sentence - The appellant is a boy from remote village who was apprehended with narcotics and that is non-commercial quantity of chars. In these circumstances, considering fact that sentence can be imposed upto 10 years and there is no minimum sentence prescribed, modifying sentence and reduced it to 5 years from 9 years. As far as fine amount Rs. 20,000/- is concerned, same remained unaltered meaning thereby that the appellant is sentenced to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment and pay fine of Rs, 20,000/- Appeal partly allowed

JUDGMENT :

The appellant, hereinafter to be referred as ‘the accused’ was convicted and sentenced under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in short ‘the Act’ for holding 1 KG ‘charas’. Vide impugned judgment, the accused was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of nine years and to pay fine of rupees 20,000/-. In default of payment of fine, accused shall also undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months, hence the present appeal preferred by the accused/convict.

2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the appeal are that Head Constable Roop Singh PW-8, Investigating Officer, Police Post Banikhet alongwith Constable Sanjay Kumar PW-2 and some other police officials were on Nakabandi and traffic checking duty at Kheri Bridge, Banikhet. At about 9 pm, when the police party consisting of HC Roop Singh PW-8, Constable Sanjay Kumar PW-2 HHC Mazi Mohammad, Constable Ram Prakash, Excise and Taxation Inspector Naresh Chand PW-1 and one Purshottam were present on the bridge, the accused came walking from the side of Kheri side carrying back on his right shoulder. On seeing the policy party he got scared and had tried to run back. On suspicion he was apprehended. On inquiry, he naratted his name as Ravi Kumar son of Sh. Hari Ram. Head Constable Roop Singh then apprised him about of his right of being searched either before a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer. He consented to be searched by the policy party. Memo Ext. PW1/A was prepared. HC Roop Singh along with other police officials, Excise and Taxation Inspector and the public witnesses had offered themselves to be searched by the accused. Memo Ext. PW1/D was prepared and nothing incriminating was recovered from his person. HC Roop Singh then conducted the search of the bag, Ext. P2, which the accused was carrying. A polythene envelope Ext.P3 was found to be there in the bag. On search, the polythene envelope was found containing in it a black coloured substance in the shape of sticks and balls. It was identified to be Charas Ext. P4. The Charas was weighed with the help of a traditional weighing scale and it was found to be 1 Kg. The Charas was then put back in the same polythene envelope and the envelope was then put back in the same carry bag. The bag was then packed and sealed in a parcel Ext. P-1 and sealed with five seals of impression X. Sample seal was taken on a piece of cloth Ext. PW1/B. NCB-1 form Ext. PW6/C was filled in triplicate. The seal impression X was put on the NCB-1 forms. The seal after use was handed over to Purshottam. The parcel containing the Charas was seized vide memo Ext. PW1/C . Rukka Ext PW-8/A was prepared and it was handed over to constable Sanjay Kumar with the direction to carry it to Police Station, Dalhousie for registration of the FIR. A carbon copy of Rukka Ext. PW 7/A was also sent through constable Ram Prakash to Superintendent of Police, Chamba. ASI Jeet Singh PW-6 registered the FIR Ext. PW6/A, made an endorsement on Rukka and had sent the case file to the spot. The investigation was conducted by HC Roop Singh, who prepared the site plan Ext. PW8/B and recorded the statements of the witnesses. The accused was arrested vide memo Ext PW-1/E. The case property consisting of parcel, NCB-1 form in triplicate and sample seal X were handed over to ASI Jeet Singh PW-6, who was officiating as Station House Officer, Police Station, Dalhousie, at the relevant time for resealing the parcel. ASI Jeet Singh had resealed the parcel with two seals of impression H. Specimen seal impression of seal H was taken on a piece of cloth Ext. PW1/B. The case property along with documents was handed over to MHC Bhajan Singh, PW-3. MHC had made an entry in the register of Malkhana, copy of which is Ext. PW3/A and had deposited the same in Malkhana. The case property alongwith documents was handed over to HHC Kamal Kumar PW-4 with the direction to carry it to State FSL, Junga vide R.C No. 151/2009, copy of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top