TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SATYEN VAIDYA
PARSHOTAM SINGH, S/O SH. OM PRAKASH VERMA – Appellant
Versus
HIMACHAL PRADESH SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD, HAMIRPUR, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN – Respondent
ORDER :
The instant petition has been filed for grant of the following substantive reliefs:-
(ii) That in the alternative the applicant be considered for the post of Junior Draftsman (Civil).
(iii) That the entire process for selections of Junior Draftsman (Civil) may kindly be set-aside.”
2. The Himachal Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Board, Hamirpur, (for short ‘Board’) invited applications for the post of Junior Draughtsman (Civil) for which examination was held on 5th July, 2015. The petitioner obtained 143 marks whereas the last selected candidate obtained 144 marks. Meaning thereby, the petitioner fell short of only one mark in the selection. After declaration of the result, the petitioner registered his objections with the Board relating to Question Nos. 10, 32, 64, 90, 104 and 159. The Board, in turn, got these questions vetted by the Expert Panel and the same was made available to the petitioner.
3. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that some of the questions, more particularly, question numbers 64,90 and 104, as answered by the Experts, are still incorrect, hence, this p
Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Mukesh Thakur and another (2010) 6 SCC 759
Central Board of Secondary Education through Secretary
Vikesh Kumar Gupta and another vs. State of Rajasthan and others (2021) 2 SCC 309
Basavaiah v. H.L. Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372
Richal v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission (2018) 8 SCC 81
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.