SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 752

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
HHC Sanjeev Kumar, S/o. Shri Ram Narayan Bhagat - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh, Through Secretary (Home) Government of H.P. & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 3527 of 2021
Decided On : 27-09-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri Rajiv Rai,
For the Respondent:M/s Adarsh Sharma, Sumesh Raj and Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocates General.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Petitioner joined Police Department as a constable - According to petitioner, after his appointment he has served at various places from time to time - He has an un-blemished service record of more than 32 years -Vide Office Order, he was transferred from District Kinnaur to CID Unit - According to petitioner, while discharging his duties in CID Unit there has never been any complaint against him from any quarter -As per petitioner, he has been transferred vide impugned transfer order from CID Unit to district without any cogent reason and without allowing him to complete his normal tenure of three years - According to petitioner, there are number of constables serving in CID, who have more than five years service in Unit, whereas petitioner has been victimized by adopting pick and choose basis – Held, Court is of considered view that as CID indeed is a sensitive organization, prerogative of employer as to who is to be posted in CID Unit, should not be interfered by Court until and unless on face of it, it can be demonstrated that power of transfer has been exercised by employer in a completely arbitrary manner - In present case, petitioner has failed to demonstrate the same - Contention of petitioner that his transfer is bad as same was done during period of ban on transfers which entails permission of Worthy Chief Minister which was not obtained in his case, is belied from record as same demonstrates that transfer of petitioner was on basis of approval, so granted qua transfers of officials mentioned by Worthy Chief Minister, who Court has been informed, also is head of Home Department to Government of Himachal Pradesh, under which Police Department falls - Petitioner is to allege malafidies, then person concerned, against whom malafidies are alleged, has to be implied as a party respondent with specific allegations of malafidies, so that such person gets an opportunity to refute it, which has not been done by petitioner in this case – Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the transfer order, dated 22.03.2021 (Annexure P-1), vide which he has been transferred from the CID Unit to district Kinnaur.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are as under:-

The petitioner joined the Police Department as a constable on 14.03.1988. According to the petitioner, after his appointment he has served at various places from time to time. He has an un-blemished service record of more than 32 years. Vide Office Order dated 26.07.2019, he was transferred from District Kinnaur to the CID Unit. According to the petitioner, while discharging his duties in CID Unit there has never been any complaint against him from any quarter. As per the petitioner, he has been transferred vide impugned transfer order dated 22.03.2021 from the CID Unit to district Kinnaur without any cogent reason and without allowing him to complete his normal tenure of three years. According to the petitioner, there are number of constables serving in the CID, who have more than five years service in the Unit, whereas the petitioner has been victimized by adopting pick and choose basis. According to him, the impugned transfer order is in violation of instructions dated 19.11.2020, issued by the Government of Himachal Pradesh, which are applicable to the Police Department of the State also, in terms whereof no transfer or adjustment is to be permitted during the period when there is ban of transfers, without the permission of the Worthy Chief Minister and in the present case no approval was sought from the Worthy Chief Minister. It is on these basis that this Writ Petition has been filed, praying for the following relief:-

“(a) quash and set aside the impugned transfer order passed vide Annexure P/1 dated 22.03.2021.”

3. In its response, filed to the petition, the respondents have taken the stand that transfer of the petitioner from the CID Unit to district Kinnaur has been ordered on the basis of the recommendations made by the State Police Establishment Committee after due deliberation on receipt of reference from the highest administrative authorities vide transfer order dated 22.03.2021. It is further the stand of said respondents that the CID is a sensitive and specialized Organization which provides critical inputs to the government and therefore, it is the prerogative of the employer, as to which official is to be selected/kept in the CID Unit for the stated purpose as per their suitability. It is further mentioned in the reply that as the petitioner is serving against a transferable job, therefore, it is the prerogative of the employer to post its employee at any place where it deems proper and the transfer of the petitioner was made only after due diligence and after affording an opportunity of being heard to him. On these basis, the respondents have prayed for the dismissal of this writ petition.

4. By way of rejoinder, the petitioner while reiterating the grounds taken in the writ petition has also mentioned that his transfer has been made on political grounds on the basis of a D.O. Note, which also renders said transfer bad in law.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the pleadings as well as documents appended therewith.

6. The petitioner is serving as a constable in the Police Department. The post of constable is a district cadre post. The petitioner is serving as such in district Kinnaur. He was transferred vide transfer order dated 26.07.2019 (Annexure P-3) from district Kinnaur to the CID Unit. Now, the respondent-department in its wisdom has transferred the petitioner from the CID Unit back to district Kinnaur vide impugned order dated 22.03.2021 (Annexure P1).

7. This Court is of the considered view that as CID indeed is a sensitive organization, the prerogative of the employer as to who is to be posted in the CID Unit, should not be interfered by the Court until and unless on the face of it, it can be demonstrated that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top