IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
Smt. Babita W/o Shri Arsh Vardhan Singh – Petitioner
Versus
Shri Arsh Vardhan Singh S/o Shri Virender Singh – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Petition (Main) U/s 482 Cr.P.C. No. 266 of 2021
Decided On : 14-09-2021
Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 - Sections 482 and 204 - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Sections 12, 23 and 29 - Seeking quash of order - Seeking one or more relief - Protection of Women - Complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was filed by the petitioners in Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P. The same was accompanied by an application under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005. A preliminary objection was taken by the respondents with regard to maintainability of the said petition, inter-alia, on the ground that the complainants had already instituted a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which was pending adjudication before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate subsequent complaint so filed at Sirmaur was dismissed by learned Judicial Magistrate – Held, Court does not concurs with submissions made by learned Senior Counsel for petitioners that because there was no adjudication on merit by learned Magistrate and as purportedly Magistrate had no jurisdiction to dismiss complaint on the basis of pendency of another petition before Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class appeal was not maintainable order passed by Magistrate is assailable at first instance only by way of appeal under Section 29 of Act - There is a statutory remedy available with the present petitioners, these proceedings which have been initiated under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure are not maintainable because law is amply clear that where a statutory remedy is available then powers so vested under High Court under 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure stood not be invoked - Appellate Court against order passed by learned Magistrate on or appeal shall be deemed to be within limitation and learned Appellate Court shall make an endeavour to decide same finally within a period of 2 months as from the date of the receipt of the appeal on merit - Petition is disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners herein have prayed for the quashing of order dated 31.3.2021, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P. in Criminal Case No. 59 of 2020 titled as Smt. Babita and Another vs. Arsh Vardhan Singh and Others.
Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are as under:
2. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3. Learned Counsel for the respondents has taken a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of this petition on the ground that as the order assailed by way of the present petition is that of a Magistrate passed under the provisions of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the same is appealable under Section 29 of the said Act and therefore, this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not maintainable.
4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that an appeal as is envisaged under Section 29 of the 2005 Act, can be filed by an aggrieved person in case there is an adjudication on merit by the learned Magistrate on a complaint but in such like situation, where a petition has been dismissed on the ground that there was another case pending on the same cause at Derra Bassi, the only course available with the petitioners was to have had approached this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned order. He has further argued that as the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nahan District Sirmaur, H.P is inherently not sustainable in law as while passing the said order, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P. has ignored the basic provisions of Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, therefore, the petitioners have a right to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
5. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and also gone through the impugned order.
6. Before proceeding further, it is pertinent to mention that in the interregnum, certain developments took place which are necessary to be brought on record. The proceedings which the petitioners had initiated under the provisions of 2005 Act at Derra Bassi, stood withdrawn by them as is evident from the order appended with these proceedings dated 10.7.2021.
7. Be that as it may, this Court will address the preliminary objection which has been taken by respondents with regard to the maintainability of the present petition. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, is a Special Act which has been enacted to provide for more effective protection of the rights of Women granted under the Constitution who are victim of violence of any kind occurring within the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.