SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 762

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Jogga Singh Son of Sh. Ajaib Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Misc.Petition (Main) No. 1535 of 2021
Decided On : 08-09-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sh. Ajay Kochhar & Sh. Vivek Sharma, Advocates
For the Respondent:Sh. Desh Raj Thakur, Additional Advoate General With Sh. Kamal Kishore And Sh. Narender Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439, 154, 173, 299, 436A – Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 302, 201, 323, 34 - Motor Vehicles Act - Section 181 - Bail petition - Accused initially arrested in FIR were got identified by police in test identification parade, but since there was no consistency in statements of prosecution witnesses, learned court below acquitted all accused named hereinabove on ground that police has not been able to establish identity of accused - Police after arrest of present bail petitioner, who was declared as proclaimed offender got him identified in police Station by complainant, as well as his other friends and has claimed that since complainant and other persons present on spot at time of alleged incident have identified present bail petitioner, he is liable to be prosecuted for his having committed murder of deceased – Held, it is important to ascertain whether accused was participating in investigations to satisfaction of investigating officer and was not absconding or not appearing when required by investigating officer - Surely, if an accused is not hiding from investigating officer or is hiding due to some genuine and expressed fear of being victimised, it would be a factor that a judge would need to consider in an appropriate case - It is also necessary for judge to consider whether accused is a first-time offender or has been accused of other offences and if so, nature of such offences and his or her general conduct - Object of bail is to secure attendance of accused in trial and proper test to be applied in solution of question whether bail should be granted or refused is whether it is probable that the party will appear to take his trial - Court has to keep in mind nature of accusations, nature of evidence in support thereof, severity of punishment, which conviction will entail, character of accused, circumstances which are peculiar to accused involved in that crime – Bail granted subject to conditions.

ORDER :

Bail petitioner, namely Jogga Singh, who is behind the bars since 26.4.2021, has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying therein for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.142 of 2007, dated 1.7.2007, registered at police Station, Dhalli, District Shimla, H.P. under Sections 302, 201, 323 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

2. Respondent-State has filed the Status report and SI Ranjeet Singh, has also come present alongwith the record. Record perused and returned.

3. Perusal of status report/record made available to this Court reveals that on 1.07.2007, complainant Virender Negi got his statement recorded under Section 154 Cr.P.C., alleging therein that on 30.6.2007, he alongwith his friends, namely Harish, Nitin, Vikas Verma, Vineet, and Amit Joshi, purchased two bottles of liquor (Royal Stag) at 8:00 PM from liquor vend at Sanjauli and after getting few eatables item packed went towards Kalyani Helipad, Chharabra in Maruti Car No. CH-03-0326. He disclosed to the police that they all consumed 1½ bottle of liquor at Kalyani Helipad while sitting in one corner and started dancing. He alleged that on the other corner of Helipad four vehicles were parked and few people were also dancing outside their cars. Complainant, named hereinabove, disclosed to the police that after some time, two vehicles left and when they had finished/consumed 1 ½ bottle of liquor, one person came from other end of Helipad and asked for water. He alleged that he does not know whether his friend Vikas Verma gave him water or not, but he went alongwith that person on the pretext that he wants to dance on Punjabi songs. Complainant alleged that after some time at 11:00 PM, when he went for urination, he saw that Vikas Verma was lying on the ground and some people were giving him beatings. Complainant alleged that they were 10 to 11 in number and when he tried to save/rescue Vikas Verma, he was hit with something on his knee by some person, as a consequence of which, he became unconscious. Complainant alleged that after some time, he and his other friends Amit, Harish, Nitin and Vineet made him awake and disclosed that some people driving PB number Silver Metelic car run over their vehicle over Vikas Verma and fled away from the spot. Complainant alleged that they all brought Vikas Verma to IGMC in car, but he was declared brought dead. Complainant disclosed that all the persons, who gave beatings, were of age of 20-21 and he can recognize 2-3 persons, if brought before him. On the basis of aforesaid statement of complainant recorded under Section 154 Cr.P.C, FIR, as detailed hereinabove, came to be lodged. During investigation names of Gurpreet Singh, Anish Khan, Kuldeep Singh, Aman Bhardwaj and Shishu Pal were surfaced. Allegedly, during investigation above named persons disclosed to the police that present bail petitioner Jogga Singh was also alongwith them and as such, Jogga Singh also came to be named in the challan filed under Section 173 Cr.P.C. However, since above named Jogga Singh and other accused Gurvinder Singh failed to make themselves available for investigation, they were declared proclaimed offender vide order dated 3.11.2007. Record reveals that proceedings under Section 299 Cr.P.C., was initiated against the proclaimed offenders, named hereinabove, including the present bail petitioner and vide order dated 23.3.2019 prosecution evidence under Section 299 Cr.P.C. was closed and file was consigned to the record room. Record reveals that other co-accused, named hereinabove, were acquitted of the charges framed against them from the court of learned Sessions Judge (Forest) Shimla. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the acquittal of the accused, named hereinabove, respondent-State has filed appeal, which is pending adjudication before this Court. On 26.4.2021, police arrested the present bail petitioner pursuant to proclamation i

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top