ORDER :

1. The writ petitioner was conferred, the status of a work charge employee, under the respondents, in the year 2002. However, she claimed that she was to be regularized in the year (supra), whereas she became regularized in the year 2007. Moreover, the writ petitioner has superannuated from service in the year 2012. Therefore the writ petitioner, through the instant petition, has canvassed the granting to her, the afore relief alongwith the relief, of hers being bestowed the benefit of Annexure A-7, wherein, class IV daily wagers engaged prior to 2001 i.e. when an earlier notification, limiting the age of class IV employees, was reduced from 60 to 58 years, was made, rather a prescription being embodied, that daily wagers (supra) will cease in the employment, at the age of 60 years, whereas, daily wagers deployed after reduction of age limit in the year 2001, will superannuate on theirs attaining the age of 58 years.

2. Annexure A-7 has been drawn on 22.2.2010, and, it prescribes therein, that only class IV daily wager engaged prior to 2001, would become entitled to be superannuated, at the age of 60 years, whereas those daily wager who became deployed after 2001, will supera