SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 883

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SATYEN VAIDYA, JJ.
Pradeep Kumar S/O Late Amar Sain – Appellant
Versus
The State Electricity Board Ltd., - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No.2573 of 2021
Decided on : 10-09-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :SH. V.D. KHIDTTA, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:SH. VIKRANT THAKUR, ADVOCATE

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 16 – Equality before Law - Rule of law - Petitioner was appointed as a Clerk and joined as such in year 1989 in the Office of ACT III where he worked - Thereafter, petitioner worked at various places and vide order, he was transferred, where he joined - Again, petitioner was transferred vide order from Andhara Power House Division to Electrical Division and aggrieved thereby has filed instant petition for reliefs as set out above - Whether order of transfer passed is bonafide or as a measure of punishment – Held, we are at a complete loss to understand as to source of power and authority of author of this letter to make recommendations to Hon’ble Chief Minister - After-all, court are governed by rule of law - That apart, transfer cannot be used as a medium to scuttle or choke voice of dissent - If at all there was any complaint regarding work and conduct of persons proposed to be transferred including petitioner, then only legitimate legal course open was that of taking disciplinary action by initiation of disciplinary proceedings - voice of dissent cannot be silenced through administrative arbitrariness - However, court need to clarify that no freedom can be absolute - As freedom walks with its head held high, a shadow of responsibility follows it - Responsibility is the epiderm within which freedom stays free and secured and secured for all - Constitutional responsibility belongs to this variety and exists as an invisible layer, a membrane, between right to free speech and reasonable restrictions that may operate on it - Remove responsibility from all, it will be chaos - Petition accordingly allowed

ORDER :

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.

1. Aggrieved by the order of transfer, the petitioner has filed the instant petition for grant of the following reliefs:-

    “(i) That the impugned order of transfer dated 17.04.2021 (Annexure P-1) may kindly be quashed and set aside.

(ii) That the petitioner may be allowed to work as Sr. Assistant at Andhara Power House HPSEBL Chirgaon till the final disposal of this writ petition.”

2. The petitioner was appointed as a Clerk and joined as such in the year 1989 in the Office of ACT III Chirgaon where he worked till 30th April, 1990. Thereafter, the petitioner worked at various places and vide order dated 04.03.2019, he was transferred at Andhara Power House, Chirgaon, where he joined on 05.03.2019. Again, the petitioner was transferred vide order dated 17.04.2021 from Andhara Power House Division Chirgaon to Electrical Division, HPSEBL, Dalhousie (Chamba) and aggrieved thereby has filed the instant petition for the reliefs as set out above.

3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that his transfer has neither been effected in administrative exigency nor in public interest, but has been effected on the basis of a D.O. Note issued by someone, who has nothing to do with the Administration and the governance of the respondent-Board.

4. The petitioner has appended a letter dated 09.03.2021 issued by one Smt. Shashi Bala to the Hon’ble Chief Minister and the same reads as under:-

    “Rural Development Bank Ltd.

SDA Complex, Kasumpti,

Shimla-171009 (H.P.) 94595-72133

Ref.No.ARDB/Chairperson/2020… Dated: 09/03/2021

PA…/2021

Respected Thakur Sahib,

Sadar Pranam.

Sir,

It is humbly that the following govt. employees are indulging in party politics and they are contaminating the working culture in their organization/institutes. It is, therefore requested to approve their transfer in the larger interest of the

public as under:-

1. Sh. Ramesh Kumar Chauhan, JE presently posted at Power House Andhra (Chirgaon) may kindly be transferred to anywhere in Distt. Chamba.

2. Sh. Suresh Kumar, presently posted as fitter at Andhra Power House (Chirgaon) may kindly be transferred to anywhere in Distt. Chamba.

3. Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Sr. Asstt. presently posted at Andhra power house (Chirgaon)may kindly be transferred anywhere in Distt. Chamba.

4. Sh. Vinod Kumar, lecturer Political Science presented posted at GSSS (Girls) Chirgaon may kindly be transferred to anywhere in Distt. Una.

5. Sh. Dilawer Singh, SEBPO, presently posted at Development Block Chhohara, Distt. Shimla may kindly be transferred to anywhere in Distt. Una.

6. Sh. Vikrant Thakur, presently posted at technician Gr.II at Mechanical Division, HPPWD Rohru for the past 20 yrs. May kindly be transferred to anywhere in Distt. Kangra District. With profound Regards.

Yours sincerely,

sd/-

(Shashi Bala)

(Dt.-09 March, 21)

Shri Jai Ram Thakur Ji,

Hon’ble Chief Minister,

Himachal Pradesh-171002.”

5. We were informed in the open Court that the author of the aforesaid letter is the Chairperson of the Rural Development Bank Ltd., which fortifies the contention of the petitioner that she has nothing to do with the working of the Administrative Department of the petitioner.

6. In CWP No. 2862 of 2021 titled Vipender Kalta vs. State of H.P. and others, decided on 20.07.2021, we had clearly observed that how people, having nothing to do with the administration and the governance of the State are calling the shots being in some kind of dominating position and getting the employees, who happen to be the government servants, transferred as per their wishes and choice by issuing recommendations to this effect and the same, in turn, are unfortunately being acted upon.

7. Like in Vipender Kalta’s case, here also, we are appalled to note that the transfer of the petitioner has been effected on the basis of the recommendations made by a politician, who as stated above, has no concern or connection with the Administration or functioning of the respondent-Board.

8. It is trite that transfer is an incidence of ser

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top