SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 846

SANDEEP SHARMA
Maninder Singh, S/o. Shri Bachan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kajal, W/o. Shri Manider Singh, D/o. Sh. Suresh Kumar Bhatnagar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi.

ORDER :

Though, notice stands served upon respondents No.1 & 2, in terms of order dated 12.06.2019, but since, none has come present on their behalf and as such, they are ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.

2. Instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India lays therein challenge to order dated 05.03.2019, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sirmour, District at Nahan (camp at Paonta Sahib) in CMA No. 13-N/6 of 2019, whereby court below while allowing the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, having been filed by respondents, directed petitioner herein, to pay sum of Rs.7000/- per month to respondent No.1, from the date of petition till final disposal of main petition. Apart from above, court below also directed petitioner herein to pay sum of Rs.15,000/- to respondent No.1, on account of litigation charges.

3. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record are that marriage inter se petitioner and respondent No.1, was solemnized on 29th July, 2010 and out of their wedlock, one daughter was born, i.e. respondent No.2, but since, certain differences cropped up inter se petitioner and respondent No.1, she started

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top