SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 842

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Jogga Singh Son Of Sh. Ajaib Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Misc.Petition (Main) No. 1535 of 2021
Decided on : 08-09-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :SH. AJAY KOCHHAR & SH. VIVEK SHARMA, ADVOCATES
For the Respondent:SH.DESH RAJ THAKUR, SH. KAMAL KISHORE, SH. NARENDER THAKUR, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERALS)

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 154, 439 -Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 302, 201, 323 r/w 34 - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 181 - Praying for grant of regular bail - As per statement of complainant all accused were cleaned shaved and it was admittedly dark, it is not understood that how he could identify petitioner brought before him after his arrest, especially when at that time petitioner was bearing turban and had beard - What compelled investigating agency to get present bail petitioner identified in police Station immediately after his arrest and why police could not file appropriate application before Magistrate for test identification parade - There is specific provision laid down in Code and Jail Manual for identification of accused, test identification done in manner that too in police Station is itself highly doubtful – Held, object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative - Object of bail is to secure attendance of accused in trial and proper test to be applied in solution of question whether bail should be granted or refused is whether it is probable that party will appear to take his trial - Normal rule is of bail and not jail - Court has to keep in mind nature of accusations, nature of evidence in support, severity of punishment, which conviction will entail, character of accused, circumstances which are peculiar to accused involved in that crime - Prima facie case against accused, nature and gravity of offence, severity of punishment, likelihood of repeating of offence by accused - Petition allowed and disposed of.

ORDER :

Bail petitioner, namely Jogga Singh, who is behind the bars since 26.4.2021, has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying therein for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.142 of 2007, dated 1.7.2007, registered at police Station, Dhalli, District Shimla, H.P. under Sections 302, 201, 323 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

2. Respondent-State has filed the Status report and SI Ranjeet Singh, has also come present alongwith the record. Record perused and returned.

3. Perusal of status report/record made available to this Court reveals that on 1.07.2007, complainant Virender Negi got his statement recorded under Section 154 Cr.P.C., alleging therein that on 30.6.2007, he alongwith his friends, namely Harish, Nitin, Vikas Verma, Vineet, and Amit Joshi, purchased two bottles of liquor (Royal Stag) at 8:00 PM from liquor vend at Sanjauli and after getting few eatables item packed went towards Kalyani Helipad, Chharabra in Maruti Car No. CH-03- 0326. He disclosed to the police that they all consumed 1 ½ bottle of liquor at Kalyani Helipad while sitting in one corner and started dancing. He alleged that on the other corner of Helipad four vehicles were parked and few people were also dancing outside their cars. Complainant, named hereinabove, disclosed to the police that after some time, two vehicles left and when they had finished/consumed 1 ½ bottle of liquor, one person came from other end of Helipad and asked for water. He alleged that he does not know whether his friend Vikas Verma gave him water or not, but he went alongwith that person on the pretext that he wants to dance on Punjabi songs. Complainant alleged that after some time at 11:00 PM, when he went for urination, he saw that Vikas Verma was lying on the ground and some people were giving him beatings. Complainant alleged that they were 10 to 11 in number and when he tried to save/rescue Vikas Verma, he was hit with something on his knee by some person, as a consequence of which, he became unconscious. Complainant alleged that after some time, he and his other friends Amit, Harish, Nitin and Vineet made him awake and disclosed that some people driving PB number Silver Metelic car run over their vehicle over Vikas Verma and fled away from the spot. Complainant alleged that they all brought Vikas Verma to IGMC in car, but he was declared brought dead. Complainant disclosed that all the persons, who gave beatings, were of age of 20-21 and he can recognize 2-3 persons, if brought before him. On the basis of aforesaid statement of complainant recorded under Section 154 Cr.P.C, FIR, as detailed hereinabove, came to be lodged. During investigation names of Gurpreet Singh, Anish Khan, Kuldeep Singh, Aman Bhardwaj and Shishu Pal were surfaced. Allegedly, during investigation above named persons disclosed to the police that present bail petitioner Jogga Singh was also alongwith them and as such, Jogga Singh also came to be named in the challan filed under Section 173 Cr.P.C. However, since above named Jogga Singh and other accused Gurvinder Singh failed to make themselves available for investigation, they were declared proclaimed offender vide order dated 3.11.2007. Record reveals that proceedings under Section 299 Cr.P.C., was initiated against the proclaimed offenders, named hereinabove, including the present bail petitioner and vide order dated 23.3.2019 prosecution evidence under Section 299 Cr.P.C. was closed and file was consigned to the record room. Record reveals that other co-accused, named hereinabove, were acquitted of the charges framed against them from the court of learned Sessions Judge (Forest) Shimla. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the acquittal of the accused, named hereinabove, respondent-State has filed appeal, which is pending adjudication before this Court. On 26.4.2021, police arrested the present bail petitioner pursuant to proclamation

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top