IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Ravinder Kumar S/o Shri Sada Ram – Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Petition (Main) No. 75 of 2022
Decided On : 08-03-2022
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 25, 29 and 37 – Charas - Quantity of contraband – Possession – Grant of Bail - Respondent-State has filed status report, perusal whereof reveals that vehicle, being driven by co-accused, came to be stopped by police party for checking, apprehending that person sitting next to driver of the car may be possessing some suspicious substance, as such, police deemed it necessary to conduct his personal search as well as of vehicle and after having associated independent witnesses, allegedly, recovered 1.107 Kg of charas from the bag kept under legs of present bail petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
Facts/reasons noted/stated hereinabove, this Court has a reason to presume and believe that recovery is doubtful and perusal of status report clearly reveals that at present no case save and except case at hand stands registered against bail petitioner under NDPS, Act - Till time, guilt of a person is not proved in accordance with law, he/she is deemed to be innocent and as such, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping bail petitioner behind bars for an indefinite period during trial, especially when nothing remains to be recovered by him. Apprehension expressed by learned Additional Advocate General that in event of bail petitioner being enlarged on bail, he may flee from justice, can be best met by putting him to stringent conditions.
ORDER :
1. By way of instant petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made on behalf the petitioner namely Ravinder Kumar for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 82/2021, dated 10.08.2021, under Sections 20, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (in short “the Act”) registered at Police Station Banjar, District Kullu, H.P.
2. Respondent-State has filed status report, perusal whereof reveals that on 10.08.2021, vehicle bearing No. HP-01B-0830, being driven by co-accused Akshay Kumar, came to be stopped by police party for checking, apprehending that person sitting next to driver of the car may be possessing some suspicious substance, as such, police deemed it necessary to conduct his personal search as well as of vehicle and after having associated independent witnesses, allegedly, recovered 1.107 Kg of charas from the bag kept under the legs of present bail petitioner. Since, occupants of the car, as detailed hereinabove, failed to render plausible explanation qua possession of aforesaid commercial quantity of contraband, police after completion of necessary codal formalities, lodged FIR, as detailed hereinabove and since then, bail petitioner is behind bars, whereas co-accused Akshay Kumar, already stands enlarged on bail, vide order dated 25th October, 2021, passed by this Court in Cr. M.P. (M) No. 1996 of 2021. Since, investigation in this case is complete and nothing remains to be recovered from the bail petitioner, prayer has been made on his behalf for grant of regular bail.
3. While fairly admitting factum with regard to filing of challan in the competent court of law, Mr. Arvind Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, contends that though nothing remains to be recovered from the present bail petitioner, but keeping in view the gravity of offence alleged to have been committed by him, prayer having been made on his behalf for grant of bail deserves outright rejection. Mr. Sharma, further submits that it stands duly established on record that commercial quantity of charas came to be recovered from the bag kept under the legs of present bail petitioner, while he was travelling in car being driven by co-accused Akshay Kumar and as such, it cannot be claimed that he has been falsely implicated. Lastly, Mr. Sharma, contends that keeping in view the quantity of contraband, allegedly, recovered from the present bail petitioner, it cannot be said that the bail petitioner being a drug addict was carrying aforesaid quantity for his own consumption, rather presumption is that he indulges in illegal trade of narcotics and as such, his enlargement on bail, may not be in the larger interest of society.
4. Having heard learned counsel representing the parties and perused the material available on record, this Court finds that commercial quantity of charas came to be recovered from the bag kept under the legs of bail petitioner when he was travelling in vehicle bearing No. HP-01B-0830 being driven by co-accused Akshay Kumar, who already stands enlarged on bail, as has been taken note hereinabove. However, version put-forth by police with regard to recovery of contraband is highly doubtful. As per police, commercial quantity of charas was kept in a bag and on opening of bag in the presence of independent witnesses, it recovered one saving bank account passbook of co-accused Akshay Kumar and Aadhar Card of present bail petitioner besides commercial quantity of contraband. It is highly unbelievable that person carrying/transporting commercial quantity of contraband would keep documents relating to his identity in the bag containing contraband. Had only one of the accused kept document pertaining to his identity in a bag containing contraband, this Court, would have agreed with the version put-forth by police, but it is highly improbable that two accused allegedly carrying commercial quantity of contraband would keep documents pertaining to their identities in the bag containing commercial quant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.