ORDER :

Petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 28.05.2016 passed by respondent No.3-Superintending Engineer, whereby his claim for regularization/work charge status, after completion of eight years of service as a Work Inspector in Irrigation and Public Health Department ( in short ‘IPH’), has been rejected. It is claim of the petitioner that persons junior to him have already been regularized after completion of eight years of continuous daily wage service.

2. Petitioner was engaged as a daily wage beldar w.e.f. 05.02.1994 and worked as daily wager Work Inspector w.e.f. 17.03.1994 in IPH Department. Therefore, he continuously served by completing 240 working days in each calendar year and completed 8 years in the year 2001. His services were regularized on 27.12.2006 as Work Inspector.

3. After regularization, petitioner filed CWP No.787 of 2009, titled as Chuni Lal & others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, which was disposed of on 18.05.2010 with a direction to respondents to consider case of the petitioner in terms of judgment of the Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. & Others, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316. However, case