IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Mohammad Rafiq, Sandeep Sharma, Jyotsna Rewal Dua, JJ.
Shimla College of Education and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh through Its Principal Secretary (Education) – Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 4113 of 2019 A/W Civil Writ Petition No. 2930 of 2018
Decided On : 06-04-2022
National Council for Teacher Education Act,1993 - Right to Education Act, 2009 - Section 2 (n) - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 19 (1) (g) – All India Council Technical Education Act,1987 - Teachers - Selection Process - Case as set up in writ petition by petitioners herein is that Petitioners Teachers Training Institutes are running diploma course in D.El.Ed., recognized by National Council of Teacher Training (NCTE), which is an Apex Regulatory Body created under NCTE Act - NCTE has framed Regulations ‘National Council for Teachers Education (Recognition, Norms and procedure) Regulations, 2009’ pertaining to the norms and standards for Diploma in Elementary Teacher Education Programme leading to Diploma in Elementary Education.
Finding of the Court:
Primary reason for seats remaining vacant in a state, is mushrooming of private institutions in higher education - This is so in several states in regard to teachers training institutions, dental colleges or engineering colleges - Second reason is certain disciplines going out of favour with students because they are considered to be no longer promising or attractive for future career prospects -Therefore, a student whose marks fall short of eligibility criteria fixed by State/University, or any college which admits such students directly under management quota, cannot contend that admission of students found qualified under criteria fixed by AICTE, should be approved even if they do not fulfil higher eligibility criteria fixed by State/University - Primary reason of seats remaining vacant in all these Institutes is mushrooming growth of such private institutions and because degrees or diplomas they award are going out of favour with students as they are no longer considered promising or attractive for future career prospects and also because of fact that some of these institutions enjoy bad reputation due to lack of infrastructure, bad faculty and indifferent teachings - Court, in taking this view, are fortified from judgment of Supreme Court in Visveswaraiah Technological University’s case, supra.
Result: Answered accordingly.
ORDER :
Mohammad Rafiq, J.
These matters have been referred to the Full Bench by order of the Division Bench dated 10.1.2020, in view of the conflict of opinion between the Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 20.9.2010 in CWP No. 5728 of 2010, titled H.P. B.Ed College Association and ors. vs. State of H.P. & anr., and another Division Bench judgment dated 23.7.2014 in CWP No. 7688 of 2013 titled HP Private Universities Management Association (HPUMA) vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others and CWP No. 840 of 2014 titled Private Technical Institution’s Association Himachal Pradesh and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others.
2. The case as set up in the writ petition by the petitioners herein is that the PetitionersTeachers Training Institutes are running diploma course in D.El.Ed., recognized by National Council of Teacher Training (NCTE), which is an Apex Regulatory Body created under NCTE Act. NCTE has framed Regulations ‘National Council for Teachers Education (Recognition, Norms and procedure) Regulations, 2009’ pertaining to the norms and standards for Diploma in Elementary Teacher Education Programme leading to Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed)’. Clause 3 (1) of the said Regulations pertains to Intake, Eligibility and Admission Procedure while Clause 3 (2), as originally framed, provides that the candidates with at least 50% marks in the senior secondary (+2) or its equivalent examination are eligible for admission. Clause 3 (2) (b) provides that the reservation for SC/ST/OBC and other categories shall be as per the rules of the Central Government/State Government whichever is applicable and there shall be relaxation of 5% marks in favour of SC/ST/OBC and other categories of candidates. Clause 3 (3) provides that the admission shall be made on merit on the basis of marks obtained in the qualifying examination and/or in the entrance examination or any other selection process as per the policy of the State Government/UT Administration. The Regulations of 2009 were amended in 2018. Clause 3.2 and Clause 3.3 as amended in 2018, which pertain to eligibility and admission procedure, provide as under:
(a) Candidates with formal education from a 'School' as defined in clause (n) of section 2 of the Right to Education Act, 2009, with at least fifty percent marks in Senior Secondary or plus two examination or its equivalent, are eligible for admission.
(b) The relaxation in percentage of marks in the Senior Secondary or plus two examination or its equivalent examination and in the reservation for Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe or Other Backward Class or Persons With Disabilities and other categories Apex shall be as per the rules of the Central Government or State Government Territory Administration, whichever is applicable.
3.3 Admission Procedure:
(a) Admission shall be made on merit basis, considering marks obtained at Senior Secondary or plus two level or equivalent examination or in an entrance examination, or any other selection process as per the policy of the University or State Government or Union Territory Administration.
(b) At the time of admission to the programme, the candidate must indicate the subject in which he or she proposes to take the B.A. or B.Sc. Degree. Admissions shall be on the basis of order of merit and availability of seats. Any change in the choice of subjects shall be made within ED TO one month from the date of commencement of the programme,”
3. The case of the Petitioner-Institutes is that they are running D.El.Ed. course as per the norms and standards prescribed by the NCTE for the last many years. All the Petitioner-Institutes are unaided and they are required to meet the requirements of infrastructure and faculty as per the norms set by NCTE and for the said purpose, the source of their income is directly dependent upon number of seats allowed to each
Christian Medical College, Vellore and others vs. Union of India and others
Dr. Preeti Srivastava and another vs. State of M.P. and others
Mahatma Gandhi University and another vs. Tikku Paul and others
Modern Dental College and Research Centre and others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
P.A Inamdar and others vs. State of Maharashtra and others
State of HP and others vs. Himachal Institute of Engg. and Technology, Shimla
State of T.N. and another vs. S.V. Bratheep (Minor) and others
T.M.A. Pai Foundation and others vs. State of Karnataka and others
Veterinary Council of India vs. Indian Council of Agricultural Research
Visveswaraiah Technological University and another vs. Krishnendu Halder and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.